Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Pharmaceutical & Health Economics, Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Jul;74(1):23-35. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.025. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Pneumococcal vaccine is recommended for adults 65 years and older and those younger than 65 years with clinical indications (eg, diabetes, lung/heart disease, kidney failure, and nephrotic syndrome). Its cost-effectiveness in less severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncharacterized.
Cost-effectiveness analysis.
SETTING & POPULATION: US adults aged 50 to 64 and 65 to 79 years stratified by CKD risk status: no CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate≥60mL/min/1.73m and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio<30mg/g), CKD with moderate risk, CKD with high risk, and kidney failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate<15mL/min/1.73m) or nephrotic-range albuminuria (urinary albumin-creatinine ratio≥2,000mg/g). Data sources were the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999 to 2004, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.
INTERVENTION(S): Vaccination compared to no vaccination.
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on US dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, & TIMEFRAME: Markov model, US health sector perspective, and lifetime horizon.
The prevalence of pneumococcal vaccination in NHANES 1999 to 2004 was 56.6% (aged 65-79 years), 28.5% (aged 50-64 years with an indication), and 9.7% (aged 50-64 years without an indication), with similar prevalences across CKD risk status. Pneumococcal vaccination was overall cost-effective (<US $100,000/QALY) for adults aged 65 to 79 years (US $15,000/QALY) and 50 to 64 years (US $38,000/QALY). Among those aged 50 to 64 years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were lowest for kidney failure or nephrotic-range albuminuria (US $1,000/QALY), followed by CKD with high risk (US $17,000/QALY), CKD with moderate risk (US $25,000/QALY), and no CKD (US $43,000/QALY). Pneumococcal vaccination was cost-effective among adults aged 50 to 64 years with CKD even when assuming the lowest vaccine efficacy or 50% higher vaccine costs.
Some model parameters were based on data from the general population. Analysis did not consider costs associated with kidney disease progression.
Uptake of pneumococcal vaccination should be improved in general. Our results also suggest the cost-effectiveness of expanding its indication to younger adults with CKD less severe than kidney failure or nephrotic syndrome.
肺炎球菌疫苗适用于 65 岁及以上的人群以及有临床指征(如糖尿病、肺部/心脏疾病、肾衰竭和肾病综合征)的 65 岁以下人群。在病情较轻的慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中,其成本效益尚未明确。
成本效益分析。
美国 50 至 64 岁和 65 至 79 岁的成年人,根据 CKD 风险状况分层:无 CKD(估算肾小球滤过率≥60mL/min/1.73m 和尿白蛋白肌酐比<30mg/g)、中危 CKD、高危 CKD、肾衰竭(估算肾小球滤过率<15mL/min/1.73m)或肾病范围蛋白尿(尿白蛋白肌酐比≥2000mg/g)。数据来源为 1999 年至 2004 年全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)、疾病控制与预防中心和社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究(ARIC)。
接种疫苗与不接种疫苗相比。
基于每质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER)。
模型、视角与时间范围:马尔可夫模型,美国卫生部门视角,终生时间范围。
NHANES 1999 年至 2004 年肺炎球菌疫苗接种的流行率为 56.6%(65-79 岁年龄组)、28.5%(有适应证的 50-64 岁年龄组)和 9.7%(无适应证的 50-64 岁年龄组),在 CKD 风险状况下具有相似的流行率。肺炎球菌疫苗接种对 65 至 79 岁成年人(15000 美元/QALY)和 50 至 64 岁成年人(38000 美元/QALY)总体来说具有成本效益(<100000 美元/QALY)。在 50 至 64 岁的成年人中,对于肾衰竭或肾病范围蛋白尿的增量成本效益比最低(1000 美元/QALY),其次是高危 CKD(17000 美元/QALY)、中危 CKD(25000 美元/QALY)和无 CKD(43000 美元/QALY)。即使假设疫苗疗效最低或疫苗成本增加 50%,肺炎球菌疫苗接种对 50 至 64 岁的 CKD 成年人来说仍然具有成本效益。
一些模型参数基于一般人群的数据。分析未考虑与肾脏病进展相关的成本。
一般来说,应提高肺炎球菌疫苗的接种率。我们的结果还表明,将其适应证扩大到病情较轻的肾衰竭或肾病综合征以下的年轻 CKD 患者是具有成本效益的。