McKerral Michelle, Moreno Alexander, Delhomme Patricia, Gélinas Isabelle
Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Departement of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 7;10:144. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00144. eCollection 2019.
Driving an automobile is an important activity for the social participation of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Return to safe driving is usually addressed during rehabilitation, but we know little about driving behaviors in the years following TBI rehabilitation. To explore self-reported and objective (official driving records) post-rehabilitation driving behaviors and offenses in individuals with TBI: (a) having passed a driving evaluation, (b) who did not undergo a driving evaluation, and (c) non-injured controls. Cross-sectional design with 162 adults: (a) 48 participants with mild, moderate, or severe TBI whose drivers' license was suspended and reinstated following a driving evaluation during rehabilitation (TBI-DE; = 42.2 years of age, = 11.5); (b) 24 participants with TBI who maintained their driving privileges without undergoing a driving evaluation (TBI-NE; = 36.5 years of age, = 9.9); (c) 90 non-injured controls ( = 43.8 years of age, = 11.4). Participants with TBI were recruited from seven rehabilitation centers, 2-3 years after the end of rehabilitation in the province of Quebec, Canada. During a telephone interview, data were obtained regarding self-reported driving: (a) habits; (b) self-efficacy; (c) anger expression; (d) sensation-seeking; (e) violations/errors; (f) accidents, driving offenses, and demerit points for the two-year interval predating the study. Objective data for driving offenses, accidents, and demerit points were obtained from the automobile regulatory body for the same period and for the two-year interval before the injury for the TBI groups. Compared to non-injured controls, the TBI-DE group reported significantly lower scores for self-reported verbal aggressive expression of anger and driving violations/errors. Conversely, their official driving records showed significantly more demerit points for the last 2 years, and a significantly higher frequency of serious post-rehabilitation accidents (10), compared to the TBI-NE group (one) and the control group (none). Compared to pre-injury levels, individuals with TBI had significantly more demerit points post-rehabilitation. Individuals with TBI may underestimate risky driving behaviors even if they have been deemed fit to drive. Reduced self-awareness, memory, and dysexecutive problems following TBI could influence self-report of driving behaviors and explain discrepancies between self-reported and objective driving-related behaviors. Recommendations for research and practice are provided.
驾驶汽车是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者社会参与的一项重要活动。恢复安全驾驶通常在康复期间进行,但我们对TBI康复后数年的驾驶行为知之甚少。为了探究TBI患者康复后的自我报告和客观(官方驾驶记录)驾驶行为及违规情况:(a)通过驾驶评估的患者;(b)未接受驾驶评估的患者;(c)未受伤的对照组。对162名成年人进行横断面设计:(a)48名患有轻度、中度或重度TBI的参与者,他们的驾照在康复期间的驾驶评估后被吊销并恢复(TBI-DE组;平均年龄 = 42.2岁,标准差 = 11.5);(b)24名未接受驾驶评估但保留驾驶特权的TBI参与者(TBI-NE组;平均年龄 = 36.5岁,标准差 = 9.9);(c)90名未受伤的对照组(平均年龄 = 43.8岁,标准差 = 11.4)。TBI患者从加拿大魁北克省康复结束后2至3年的7个康复中心招募。在电话访谈中,获取了关于自我报告驾驶的以下数据:(a)习惯;(b)自我效能感;(c)愤怒表达;(d)寻求刺激;(e)违规/失误;(f)研究前两年期间的事故、驾驶违规和扣分情况。驾驶违规、事故和扣分的客观数据来自汽车监管机构,涵盖TBI组受伤前两年和同一时期。与未受伤的对照组相比,TBI-DE组自我报告的愤怒言语攻击性表达和驾驶违规/失误得分显著更低。相反,与TBI-NE组(1起)和对照组(无)相比,他们的官方驾驶记录显示过去两年的扣分显著更多,康复后严重事故的频率显著更高(10起)。与受伤前水平相比,TBI患者康复后的扣分显著更多。TBI患者即使被认为适合驾驶,也可能低估危险驾驶行为。TBI后自我意识、记忆和执行功能障碍问题可能会影响驾驶行为的自我报告,并解释自我报告与客观驾驶相关行为之间的差异。文中提供了研究和实践建议。