• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普通人群中心电图右心室肥厚的预后意义。

Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy in the general population.

作者信息

Kowal Jamie, Ahmad Muhammad Imtiaz, Li Yabing, Soliman Elsayed Z

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hospital Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2019 May-Jun;54:49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.03.008
PMID:30901607
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Echocardiographically detected right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. However, the prognostic significance of electrocardiographic (ECG)RVH criteria as predictors of poor outcomes in the general population is unclear.

METHODS

This study included 7857 participants (59.8 ± 13.4 years, 52.6% women) from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Sixteen different ECG-RVH criteria were created from digitally recorded and centrally processed electrocardiograms. All-cause mortality was ascertained using the National Death Index. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to examine the association between baseline ECG-RVH criteria and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The prevalence of RVH varied widely among the criteria. The lowest ECG-RVH prevalence was 0.09% (using S > R in I, II, III) while the highest prevalence was 20.7% (using (R I + S III) - (S I + R III) < 15 mm). During a median follow-up of 14 years, 2812 deaths occurred. The mortality rate was highest among participants with ECG-RVH defined as R:S ratio V < 0.75. In multivariable adjusted models, 9 out of the 16 ECG-RVH criteria were significantly associated with all-cause mortality. When ECG-RVH was defined as the presence of any ECG-RVH criteria, each additional ECG-RVH criteria was associated with 6% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR (95% CI):1.06(1.03,1.10)).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variation in the prevalence of ECG-RVH when different criteria are applied in the general population. However, the presence of ECG-RVH by most criteria regardless of prevalence was associated with poor prognosis suggesting that appropriate choice of criteria may enhance the utilization of these ECG markers in risk stratification.

摘要

背景

超声心动图检测到的右心室肥厚(RVH)与心血管疾病(CVD)及死亡率相关。然而,在普通人群中,心电图(ECG)RVH标准作为不良预后预测指标的预后意义尚不清楚。

方法

本研究纳入了来自第三次全国健康与营养检查调查的7857名参与者(年龄59.8±13.4岁,女性占52.6%)。通过数字记录并集中处理的心电图创建了16种不同的ECG-RVH标准。使用国家死亡指数确定全因死亡率。采用Cox比例风险分析来检验基线ECG-RVH标准与全因死亡率之间的关联。

结果

不同标准下RVH的患病率差异很大。ECG-RVH患病率最低为0.09%(采用I、II、III导联中S>R),而最高患病率为20.7%(采用(RI+SIII)-(SI+RIII)<15mm)。在中位随访14年期间,发生了2812例死亡。在定义为V导联R:S比值<0.75的ECG-RVH参与者中,死亡率最高。在多变量调整模型中,1666种ECG-RVH标准中有9种与全因死亡率显著相关。当将ECG-RVH定义为存在任何一种ECG-RVH标准时,每增加一种ECG-RVH标准,全因死亡风险增加6%(风险比(95%置信区间):1.06(1.03,1.10))。

结论

在普通人群中应用不同标准时,ECG-RVH的患病率差异很大。然而,无论患病率如何,大多数标准下ECG-RVH的存在都与不良预后相关,这表明适当选择标准可能会提高这些ECG标记物在风险分层中的应用。

相似文献

1
Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy in the general population.普通人群中心电图右心室肥厚的预后意义。
J Electrocardiol. 2019 May-Jun;54:49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
2
Interrelation Between Electrocardiographic Left Atrial Abnormality, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Mortality in Participants With Hypertension.心电图左房异常、左室肥厚与高血压患者死亡率的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Sep 15;124(6):886-891. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
3
Association between electrocardiographic and echocardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy in a military cohort in Taiwan: The CHIEF study: ECG criteria for RVH.台湾某军事队列中心电图与超声心动图右心室肥厚的关联:CHIEF研究:右心室肥厚的心电图标准
Indian Heart J. 2017 May-Jun;69(3):331-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 May 6.
4
Clinical significance of electrocardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy in athletes: comparison with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension.运动员心电图右心室肥厚的临床意义:与致心律失常性右室心肌病和肺动脉高压的比较。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec;34(47):3649-56. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht391. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
5
Electrocardiogram for the diagnosis of right ventricular hypertrophy and dilation in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.心电图用于特发性肺动脉高压中右心室肥厚和扩张的诊断。
Circ J. 2012;76(7):1744-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-11-1517. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
6
Prognostic value of Goldberger's electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular dysfunction.戈德伯格心电图标准对左心室功能障碍的预后价值。
J Electrocardiol. 2021 Jan-Feb;64:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.11.011. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
7
Significance of electrocardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy in patients with pulmonary hypertension with or without right ventricular systolic dysfunction.伴或不伴右心室收缩功能障碍的肺动脉高压患者心电图右心室肥厚的意义
Intern Med. 2012;51(17):2277-83. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7731. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
8
Relation of Minor Electrocardiographic Abnormalities to Cardiovascular Mortality.轻微心电图异常与心血管死亡率的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 May 1;123(9):1443-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.050. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
9
Validity of the surface electrocardiogram criteria for right ventricular hypertrophy: the MESA-RV Study (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis-Right Ventricle).表面心电图标准诊断右心室肥厚的有效性:MESA-RV 研究(动脉粥样硬化多民族研究-右心室)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 25;63(7):672-681. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1633. Epub 2013 Sep 28.
10
Electrocardiographic patterns of patients with echocardiographically determined biventricular hypertrophy.经超声心动图测定为双心室肥厚患者的心电图模式。
J Electrocardiol. 1999 Jul;32(3):269-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Electrocardiogram abnormalities and prognosis in COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎的心电图异常与预后
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 5;9:993479. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.993479. eCollection 2022.