Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, United Kingdom.
Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, United Kingdom; Evolutionary Studies Institute and Centre for Excellence in PaleoSciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS 2050, South Africa.
J Hum Evol. 2019 Apr;129:54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
We report the frequencies of linear enamel hypoplasia (LEH) and, specifically, pitting enamel hypoplasia (PEH) defects in the teeth of Paranthropus robustus, for comparison with four other South African hominin species and three extant nonhuman primate species. Unlike LEH, the lesser known PEH is characterized by multiple circular depression defects across a tooth crown and is often difficult to interpret in terms of developmental timing and etiology. Teeth in all samples were examined macroscopically with type, position and number of defects recorded. Frequencies of teeth with LEH vary among hominin species, but the differences in PEH are considerable. That is, P. robustus has much higher rates of pitting defects, with 47% of deciduous teeth and 14% of permanent teeth affected, relative to 6.7% and 4.3%, respectively, for all other hominin teeth combined; none of the extant primate samples evidences comparable rates. The defects on P. robustus molars are unlike those in other species, with entire crowns often covered in small circular depressions. The PEH is most consistent with modern human examples of amelogenesis imperfecta. Additionally, the defects are: 1) not found on anterior teeth, 2) uniform in shape and size, and 3) similar in appearance/severity on all molars. Therefore, this form of PEH may have been a side effect of selection on another trait that shares the same coding gene(s), i.e., these defects have a genetic origin. We discuss a possible scenario that may explain how this form of PEH evolved to become so common in the Paranthropus genus.
我们报告了粗壮南猿(Paranthropus robustus)牙齿中线性釉质发育不全(LEH)的频率,特别是釉质点状凹陷(PEH)缺陷的频率,以供与其他四种南非古人类和三种现存非人类灵长类动物进行比较。与 LEH 不同,鲜为人知的 PEH 的特征是牙冠上有多个圆形凹陷缺陷,并且通常难以根据发育时间和病因进行解释。所有样本的牙齿均进行了宏观检查,记录了缺陷的类型、位置和数量。LEH 在人类物种中的频率有所不同,但 PEH 的差异相当大。也就是说,与所有其他人类牙齿的 6.7%和 4.3%相比,粗壮南猿的有凹陷缺陷的牙齿比例较高,乳牙有 47%,恒牙有 14%受到影响;而现存灵长类动物样本中没有类似的比例。粗壮南猿磨牙上的缺陷与其他物种不同,整个牙冠通常覆盖着小的圆形凹陷。PEH 最类似于人类釉质不全的现代人类病例。此外,这些缺陷具有以下特征:1)前牙上没有;2)形状和大小均匀;3)所有磨牙上的外观/严重程度相似。因此,这种形式的 PEH 可能是选择另一个具有相同编码基因的特征的副作用,即这些缺陷具有遗传起源。我们讨论了一种可能的情况,该情况可以解释这种形式的 PEH 是如何在粗壮南猿属中如此普遍进化的。