• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[景区低碳行为表现及其驱动机制:以张家界世界遗产地为例。]

[Low-carbon behavioral performance of scenic spots and the driving mechanism: A case study of Zhangjiajie World Heritage Site.].

作者信息

Wang Kai, Gan Chang, Ou Yan, Liu Hao Long

机构信息

Tourism College of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.

Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Jan 20;30(1):266-276. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.020.

DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.020
PMID:30907549
Abstract

Low-carbon behavior of scenic spots has direct influence on coordinated and orderly development of eco-environment and socio-economic system in World Heritage Site. Five level-one indicators and 38 level-two indicators were respectively established to systematically measure the low-carbon behavioral performance (LCBP) of scenic spots in Zhangjiajie, the seat of World Natural Heritage. ANOVA and Bonferroni analysis were applied to compare the LCBP of scenic spots in different groups. The redundancy analysis and Monte Carlo permutation were used to figure out the main driving factors that affect scenic area’s LCBP. Results showed that 32 scenic spots’ LCBP was excellent in general, with a weighted mean value of 3.10. The group mean of perfor-mance in low-carbon design, daily energy conservation, water saving management, waste reduction and low-carbon awareness was 0.49, 0.74, 0.24, 1.51 and 0.11, separately. Huanglong Cave performed the best (4.193) and He Long’s Former Residence performed the worst (2.400) in the 32 scenic spots. The scores of 5A, 4A and 3A or no A scenic spots showed no significant difference in most low-carbon behavior indicators, only 11 indicators reflected significant difference among diffe-rent groups. Pressures from investors, administration committee, tourists and local government were main driving factors for low-carbon behavior of scenic spots.

摘要

景区的低碳行为对世界遗产地生态环境与社会经济系统的协调有序发展有着直接影响。分别设立了5个一级指标和38个二级指标,用以系统衡量世界自然遗产所在地张家界景区的低碳行为表现(LCBP)。运用方差分析和邦费罗尼分析来比较不同组景区的LCBP。采用冗余分析和蒙特卡洛置换法来找出影响景区LCBP的主要驱动因素。结果显示,32个景区的LCBP总体表现出色,加权平均值为3.10。低碳设计、日常节能、节水管理、减少废弃物和低碳意识方面的组均值分别为0.49、0.74、0.24、1.51和0.11。在这32个景区中,黄龙洞表现最佳(4.193),贺龙故居表现最差(2.400)。5A级、4A级和3A级或无等级景区在大多数低碳行为指标上得分无显著差异,仅有11个指标在不同组间反映出显著差异。来自投资者、管理委员会、游客和当地政府的压力是景区低碳行为的主要驱动因素。

相似文献

1
[Low-carbon behavioral performance of scenic spots and the driving mechanism: A case study of Zhangjiajie World Heritage Site.].[景区低碳行为表现及其驱动机制:以张家界世界遗产地为例。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Jan 20;30(1):266-276. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.020.
2
[A diachronic study on resettlers' perceptions toward ecological relocation in world heritage site: A case study of Wulingyuan Scenic Area, China].[世界遗产地生态移民安置区居民生态搬迁认知的历时性研究——以中国武陵源风景名胜区为例]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Mar;29(3):997-1005. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201803.018.
3
[Application of niche theory in evaluation of main tourism scenic areas in Zhangjiajie City].[生态位理论在张家界市主要旅游景区评价中的应用]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2010 May;21(5):1315-20.
4
Measurement of Scenic Spots Sustainable Capacity Based on PCA-Entropy TOPSIS: A Case Study from 30 Provinces, China.基于 PCA-Entropy TOPSIS 的景区可持续容量测度——来自中国 30 个省份的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 22;15(1):10. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010010.
5
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Hierarchical Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Evaluating Performances of Low-Carbon Tourism Scenic Spots.低碳旅游景区绩效评价的直觉模糊层次多准则决策
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;17(17):6259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176259.
6
The influencing mechanism of scenic spot online attention and tourists' purchase behavior: an AISAS model based investigation.景区网络关注度与游客购买行为的影响机制:基于AISAS模型的调查
Front Psychol. 2024 May 23;15:1386350. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1386350. eCollection 2024.
7
Evaluation of the spatial distribution of scenic resources based on 3S technology: A case study of the Yesanpo National Park.基于 3S 技术的风景资源空间分布评价——以野三坡国家公园为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0269841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269841. eCollection 2022.
8
Managing congestion at visitor hotspots using park-level use level data: Case study of a Chinese World Heritage Site.利用公园级别使用水平数据管理游客热点拥堵问题:以中国一处世界遗产为例。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 26;14(7):e0215266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215266. eCollection 2019.
9
Evaluating the Attraction of Scenic Spots Based on Tourism Trajectory Entropy.基于旅游轨迹熵的景区吸引力评价
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jul 18;26(7):607. doi: 10.3390/e26070607.
10
Revisiting tourism in the post-pandemic era: An evaluation study of China's 5A-Class scenic spots.后疫情时代的旅游业再审视:中国5A级景区评估研究
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 2;10(3):e25411. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25411. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.