Xiang Yan-ping, Xiang Chang-guo, Chen You-lian
School of Life Science and Technology, Central South University of Forest and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2010 May;21(5):1315-20.
Five tourism scenic areas in Zhangjiajie City were selected as research objects, and fifty kinds of resource conditions affecting the development of tourism scenic area were taken as evaluation indices. Through disposing and consolidating the indices level by level, an analysis was made on the niche breadth and niche overlap of the five tourism scenic areas at three levels (I, II, and III). In the five scenic areas, index level had significant effects on the niche breadth (F = 10.278, P = 0.006), but less effects on the relative niche breadth, suggesting that in the evaluation of the development potential of tourism scenic area, relative niche breadth was more reasonable than absolute niche breadth. From level III to level I, the niche overlap of the five scenic areas was increasing, indicating that level choice would affect the evaluation of the actual niche overlap of the scenic areas. With the progressive refinement of the indices to certain level, and when the difference between observed and Monte Carlo-simulated Pianka indices achieved to significant level, this index level could be used as the minimum standard of the refinement, and the simulated niche overlap could be taken as an important reference in the competition evaluation of tourism scenic area.
选取张家界市5个旅游景区作为研究对象,将影响旅游景区发展的50种资源条件作为评价指标。通过对指标进行逐级处理与整合,对5个旅游景区在I、II、III三个层次上的生态位宽度和生态位重叠进行了分析。在这5个景区中,指标层次对生态位宽度有显著影响(F = 10.278,P = 0.006),但对相对生态位宽度影响较小,这表明在旅游景区发展潜力评价中,相对生态位宽度比绝对生态位宽度更合理。从III层次到I层次,5个景区的生态位重叠呈增加趋势,说明层次选择会影响对景区实际生态位重叠的评价。随着指标细化到一定程度,当观测的Pianka指数与蒙特卡洛模拟的Pianka指数差异达到显著水平时,该指标层次可作为细化的最低标准,模拟的生态位重叠可作为旅游景区竞争评价的重要参考。