1Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Ottawa, Ontario.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Ottawa, Ontario.
Health Phys. 2019 Sep;117(3):319-329. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001060.
The linear no-threshold (linear-non-threshold) model is a dose-response model that has long served as the foundation of the international radiation protection framework, which includes the Canadian regulatory framework. Its purpose is to inform the choice of appropriate dose limits and subsequent as low as reasonably achievable requirements, social and economic factors taken into account. The linear no-threshold model assumes that the risk of developing cancer increases proportionately with increasing radiation dose. The linear no-threshold model has historically been applied by extrapolating the risk of cancer at high doses (>1,000 mSv) down to low doses in a linear manner. As the health effects of radiation exposure at low doses remain ambiguous, reducing uncertainties found in cancer risk dose-response models can be achieved through in vitro and animal-based studies. The purpose of this critical review is to analyze whether the linear no-threshold model is still applicable for use by modern nuclear regulators for radiation protection purposes, or if there is sufficient scientific evidence supporting an alternate model from which to derive regulatory dose limits.
线性无阈(linear-non-threshold)模型是一种剂量反应模型,长期以来一直是国际辐射防护框架的基础,其中包括加拿大的监管框架。其目的是为适当的剂量限制和随后的尽可能低的可实现要求提供信息,同时考虑到社会和经济因素。线性无阈模型假设癌症风险随着辐射剂量的增加而成比例增加。线性无阈模型历史上一直通过以线性方式将高剂量(>1000mSv)的癌症风险外推到低剂量来应用。由于低剂量辐射暴露的健康影响仍不明确,因此可以通过体外和动物研究来减少癌症风险剂量反应模型中的不确定性。本批判性评论的目的是分析线性无阈模型是否仍然适用于现代核监管机构用于辐射防护目的,或者是否有足够的科学证据支持替代模型来推导监管剂量限制。