• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

东南亚一个发展中国家的乳腺癌诊断效能

Breast Cancer Diagnostic Efficacy in a Developing South-East Asian Country.

作者信息

Jackson Rhianna L, Double Callan R, Munro Hayden J, Lynch Jessica, Tapia Kriscia A, Trieu Phuong Dung, Alakhras Maram, Ganesan Aarthi, Do Thuan Doan, Soh Baolin Pauline, Brennan Patrick C, Puslednik Puslednik

机构信息

St Matthews Catholic School, Mudgee, New South Wales, Australia. Email:

Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):727-731. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.727.

DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.727
PMID:30909671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6825776/
Abstract

Background: Breast cancer, is increasing in prevalence amongst South East (SE) Asian women, highlighting the need for high quality, early diagnoses. This study investigated radiologists’ detection efficacy in a developing (DC) and developed (DDC) SE Asian country, as compared to Australian radiologists. Methods: Using a test-set of 60 mammographic cases, 20 containing cancer, JAFROC figures of merit (FOM) and ROC area under the curves (AUC) were calculated as well as location sensitivity, sensitivity and specificity. The test set was examined by 35, 15, and 53 radiologists from DC, a DDC and Australia, respectively. Results: DC radiologists, compared to both groups of counterparts, demonstrated significantly lower JAFROC FOM, ROC AUC and specificity scores. DC radiologists had a significantly lower location sensitivity than Australian radiologists. DC radiologists also demonstrated significantly lower values for age, hours of reading per week, and years of mammography experience when compared with other radiologists. Conclusion: Significant differences in breast cancer detection parameters can be attributed to the experience of DC radiologists. The development of inexpensive, innovative, interactive training programs are discussed. This nonuniform level of breast cancer detection between countries must be addressed to achieve the World Health Organisation goal of health equity.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌在东南亚女性中的患病率正在上升,这凸显了高质量早期诊断的必要性。本研究调查了与澳大利亚放射科医生相比,一个发展中东南亚国家(DC)和一个发达东南亚国家(DDC)的放射科医生的检测效能。方法:使用包含60例乳腺钼靶病例的测试集,其中20例含有癌症,计算了JAFROC优值(FOM)和ROC曲线下面积(AUC)以及定位敏感性、敏感性和特异性。分别由来自DC、DDC和澳大利亚的35名、15名和53名放射科医生对测试集进行检查。结果:与两组同行相比,DC放射科医生的JAFROC FOM、ROC AUC和特异性得分显著更低。DC放射科医生的定位敏感性显著低于澳大利亚放射科医生。与其他放射科医生相比,DC放射科医生在年龄、每周阅读小时数和乳腺钼靶检查经验年限方面的值也显著更低。结论:乳腺癌检测参数的显著差异可归因于DC放射科医生的经验。讨论了开发廉价、创新、交互式培训项目的问题。必须解决各国之间乳腺癌检测水平不一致的问题,以实现世界卫生组织的健康公平目标。

相似文献

1
Breast Cancer Diagnostic Efficacy in a Developing South-East Asian Country.东南亚一个发展中国家的乳腺癌诊断效能
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):727-731. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.727.
2
Reading High Breast Density Mammograms: Differences in Diagnostic Performance between Radiologists from Hong Kong SAR/Guangdong Province in China and Australia.阅读高乳腺密度乳房 X 光片:来自中国香港特别行政区/广东省和澳大利亚的放射科医生之间诊断性能的差异。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):2623-2629. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.9.2623.
3
Does mammographic density remain a radiological challenge in the digital era?在数字化时代,乳腺密度仍是影像学难题吗?
Acta Radiol. 2021 Jun;62(6):707-714. doi: 10.1177/0284185120938367. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
4
Impact of Breast Reader Assessment Strategy on mammographic radiologists' test reading performance.乳腺阅片者评估策略对乳腺钼靶放射科医生阅片表现的影响。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jun;60(3):352-8. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12461. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
5
Observer Variability in Breast Cancer Diagnosis between Countries with and without Breast Screening.国家间乳腺癌筛检有无对乳腺癌诊断的观察者变异。
Acad Radiol. 2019 Jan;26(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
6
Mammographic interpretation in Vietnam: Tailored educational strategies are needed to increase clinicians' expertise.越南的乳腺 X 线摄影判读:需要制定有针对性的教育策略来提高临床医生的专业知识。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct;17(5):e212-e216. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13436. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Improvement of Cancer Detection on Mammograms via BREAST Test Sets.通过 BREAST 测试集提高乳房 X 光照片中的癌症检测率。
Acad Radiol. 2019 Dec;26(12):e341-e347. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.12.017. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
8
Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?乳腺钼靶密度与癌症检测:数字成像是否对我们目前的认知提出了挑战?
Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
9
Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings.在乳腺 X 光摄影中,表现良好的标志物取决于每年的阅读次数。
Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):61-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122581. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
10
Radiologists’ Performance at Reduced Recall Rates in Mammography: A Laboratory Study.乳腺钼靶检查中降低召回率时放射科医生的表现:一项实验室研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Feb 26;20(2):537-543. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.537.

引用本文的文献

1
Variations of image interpretations of radiologists from different populations in mammography and tomosynthesis with different levels of breast density.不同人群的放射科医生在乳腺钼靶摄影和断层合成成像中对不同乳腺密度水平的图像解读差异。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Mar;10(2):025502. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.2.025502. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Look how far we have come: BREAST cancer detection education on the international stage.看看我们已经取得了多大的进展:国际舞台上的乳腺癌检测教育。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 4;12:1023714. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1023714. eCollection 2022.
3
A Scoping Review on the Status of Female Breast Cancer in Asia with a Special Focus on Nepal.一项关于亚洲女性乳腺癌现状的范围综述,特别关注尼泊尔。
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2022 Aug 26;14:229-246. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S366530. eCollection 2022.
4
Improving radiologist's ability in identifying particular abnormal lesions on mammograms through training test set with immediate feedback.通过使用具有即时反馈的训练测试集来提高放射科医生识别乳腺 X 光片中特定异常病变的能力。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 10;11(1):9899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89214-3.

本文引用的文献

1
A Simulation Screening Mammography Module Created for Instruction and Assessment: Radiology Residents vs National Benchmarks.为教学与评估创建的模拟乳腺钼靶筛查模块:放射科住院医师与全国基准对比
Acad Radiol. 2016 Nov;23(11):1454-1462. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
2
Influences of Radiology Trainees on Screening Mammography Interpretation.放射科住院医师对乳腺钼靶筛查解读的影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 May;13(5):554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
3
Female breast cancer in Vietnam: a comparison across Asian specific regions.越南女性乳腺癌:亚洲特定地区的比较
Cancer Biol Med. 2015 Sep;12(3):238-45. doi: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2015.0034.
4
Number of mammography cases read per year is a strong predictor of sensitivity.每年乳腺X线摄影病例的阅片数量是灵敏度的一个强有力预测指标。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2014 Apr;1(1):015503. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.1.015503. Epub 2014 May 7.
5
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.全球癌症发病与死亡:GLOBOCAN 2012 数据源、方法与主要模式。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
6
Single reading with computer-aided detection performed by selected radiologists in a breast cancer screening program.在乳腺癌筛查项目中,由选定的放射科医生进行的计算机辅助检测单次阅片。
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Nov;83(11):2019-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings.在乳腺 X 光摄影中,表现良好的标志物取决于每年的阅读次数。
Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):61-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122581. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
8
Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.假阳性筛查性乳房 X 光检查的长期心理社会后果。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):106-15. doi: 10.1370/afm.1466.
9
Screening mammography: test set data can reasonably describe actual clinical reporting.乳腺 X 线筛查:测试集数据可合理描述实际临床报告。
Radiology. 2013 Jul;268(1):46-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122399. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
10
Effect of radiologist experience on the risk of false-positive results in breast cancer screening programs.放射科医生经验对乳腺癌筛查计划中假阳性结果风险的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2011 Oct;21(10):2083-90. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2160-0. Epub 2011 Jun 4.