• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按诊断相关分组的胆囊切除术总利用率

Total cholecystectomy utilization by diagnosis related group.

作者信息

Lagoe R J, Cady D M

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1986 Sep;121(9):1006-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400090032005.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400090032005
PMID:3090977
Abstract

Utilization rates for total cholecystectomy by diagnosis related group in Sacramento, Calif, and Syracuse, NY, between 1981 and 1984 were studied. The two areas had similar hospital discharge rates and bed supplies. The data included 8989 discharges. Discharge rates for the combined cholecystectomy diagnosis related groups differed by only 1% to 3%. Syracuse mean stays for these categories exceeded those of Sacramento by 34% to 38% and were the principal cause of differences in hospital utilization for the procedure. These differences were related to more conservative community-wide physician practice patterns in Syracuse rather than to differences in the composition of the samples by age and payor status, or to the impact of length of stay variability. In the future, shorter stays for cholecystectomy, such as those of Sacramento, may become the norm for the entire nation.

摘要

对1981年至1984年间加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托市和纽约州锡拉丘兹市按诊断相关分组的胆囊切除术总使用率进行了研究。这两个地区的医院出院率和床位供应情况相似。数据包括8989例出院病例。胆囊切除术诊断相关分组的综合出院率仅相差1%至3%。锡拉丘兹市这些类别的平均住院天数比萨克拉门托市超出34%至38%,这是该手术医院使用率存在差异的主要原因。这些差异与锡拉丘兹市更保守的社区医生执业模式有关,而非与样本按年龄和付款人身份的构成差异或住院天数变异性的影响有关。未来,像萨克拉门托市那样较短的胆囊切除术后住院天数可能会成为全国的标准。

相似文献

1
Total cholecystectomy utilization by diagnosis related group.按诊断相关分组的胆囊切除术总利用率
Arch Surg. 1986 Sep;121(9):1006-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400090032005.
2
Obstetric hospital stays by diagnosis related groups: a community-based analysis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):873-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90474-6.
3
A community-based analysis of regional differences in hospital stays by diagnosis related group.一项基于社区的按诊断相关分组对住院时间区域差异的分析。
Inquiry. 1986 Summer;23(2):183-90.
4
Mastectomies for malignancy: a DRG-based hospital utilization analysis.恶性肿瘤乳房切除术:基于疾病诊断相关分组的医院利用情况分析。
J Surg Oncol. 1987 May;35(1):19-23. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930350105.
5
Hospital stays by diagnosis related group for neurologic patients treated medically.因诊断相关分组而住院治疗的神经病学患者。
Neurology. 1987 Jan;37(1):139-45. doi: 10.1212/wnl.37.1.139.
6
Stroke hospitalization under prospective payments: analysis of diagnosis related group 14.前瞻性支付下的中风住院治疗:诊断相关组14分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Nov;66(11):773-6.
7
Has laparoscopic cholecystectomy changed patterns of practice and patient outcome in Ontario?在安大略省,腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否改变了医疗实践模式和患者预后?
CMAJ. 1996 Feb 15;154(4):491-500.
8
Evaluation of the impact of Medicare and Medicaid prospective payment on utilization of Philadelphia area hospitals.评估医疗保险和医疗补助预期支付对费城地区医院医疗服务利用情况的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1986 Oct;21(4):529-46.
9
Comparing a single-staged laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration versus a two-staged endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.比较一期腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管探查术与两期内镜下括约肌切开术联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Surgery. 2018 Nov;164(5):1030-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.052. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
10
Community based analysis of Medicare inpatient utilization: DRG 468.基于社区的医疗保险住院患者利用率分析:疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)468
J Am Med Rec Assoc. 1985 Oct;56(10):22-7.