• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本微创远端胰腺切除术困难评分系统的外部验证。

External validation of the Japanese difficulty scoring system for minimally-invasive distal pancreatectomies.

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Level 5 Academia, 169856, Singapore; Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Level 5 Academia, 169856, Singapore.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2019 Nov;218(5):967-971. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.012
PMID:30910129
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative prediction of the difficulty of surgery would be useful for surgeons embarking on MIDP. A novel difficulty scoring system(DSS) was recently developed in Japan but has not been externally validated. This study aims to externally validate the DSS determine its association with important clinical outcome parameters.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 90 patients who underwent MIDP from 2006 to 2018. The patients were stratified into 3 groups (low, intermediate and high difficulty) according to the DSS with some minor modifications.

RESULTS

Difficulty of MIDP was classified as low in 45(50%), intermediate in 32(35.5%) and high in 13(14.4%). Comparison between the baseline characteristics across the 3 difficulty groups demonstrated a significant difference in the frequency of malignant tumors, larger tumor size, frequency of extended pancreatectomies and use of robotic assistance. There was statistically significant increase in operation time, blood loss and blood transfusion rate across the 3 groups from low to high difficulty.

CONCLUSION

The DSS correlated significantly with operation time, blood loss and blood transfusion rate. These findings support the validity of the system.

摘要

简介

对于接受 MIDP 的外科医生来说,术前预测手术难度将非常有用。日本最近开发了一种新的困难评分系统(DSS),但尚未经过外部验证。本研究旨在对 DSS 进行外部验证,并确定其与重要临床结果参数的相关性。

方法

回顾性分析了 2006 年至 2018 年间接受 MIDP 的 90 例患者。根据 DSS 将患者分为 3 组(低、中、高难度),并进行了一些小的修改。

结果

MIDP 的难度分类为低难度 45 例(50%)、中难度 32 例(35.5%)和高难度 13 例(14.4%)。对 3 组之间的基线特征进行比较,结果显示在恶性肿瘤发生率、肿瘤大小、扩大胰切除术的频率以及机器人辅助手术的使用方面存在显著差异。随着难度从低到高,手术时间、出血量和输血率均有统计学意义的增加。

结论

DSS 与手术时间、出血量和输血率显著相关。这些发现支持该系统的有效性。

相似文献

1
External validation of the Japanese difficulty scoring system for minimally-invasive distal pancreatectomies.日本微创远端胰腺切除术困难评分系统的外部验证。
Am J Surg. 2019 Nov;218(5):967-971. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
2
Assessment of difficulty in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A modification of the Japanese difficulty scoring system - A single-center high-volume experience.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术难度评估:日本难度评分系统的改良-单中心大宗病例经验。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Sep;28(9):770-777. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1010. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
3
A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Mar;13(1). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1733. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
4
Learning Curves of Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy in Experienced Pancreatic Centers.经验丰富的胰腺中心微创远端胰腺切除术的学习曲线。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Sep 1;158(9):927-933. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2279.
5
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: greatest benefit for the frail.微创远端胰腺切除术:对体弱患者最有益。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5234-5240. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5593-y. Epub 2017 May 10.
6
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.微创与开腹远端胰腺切除术(LEOPARD):一项多中心患者盲法随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):2-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979.
7
Critical Appraisal of the Impact of Individual Surgeon Experience on the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomies: Collective Experience of Multiple Surgeons at a Single Institution.对单个外科医生经验对微创远端胰腺切除术结果影响的批判性评估:单一机构多位外科医生的集体经验。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Aug;30(4):361-366. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000800.
8
Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique.机器人辅助微创远端胰腺切除术优于腹腔镜技术。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):128-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fff08.
9
Impact of a Nationwide Training Program in Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy (LAELAPS).全国性微创远端胰腺切除术(LAELAPS)培训计划的影响。
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):754-762. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001888.
10
Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.微创与开腹远端胰腺切除术治疗导管腺癌(DIPLOMA):一项泛欧倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):10-17. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002561.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of factors predicting loss of benefit provided by laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy compared to open approach.评价腹腔镜胰体尾切除术相对于开腹手术优势丧失的预测因素。
Updates Surg. 2022 Feb;74(1):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01194-1. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
2
Assessment of difficulty in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A modification of the Japanese difficulty scoring system - A single-center high-volume experience.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术难度评估:日本难度评分系统的改良-单中心大宗病例经验。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Sep;28(9):770-777. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1010. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
3
The Usefulness of a Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting the Probability of Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single-Center Experience.
术前列线图预测腹腔镜向开腹远端胰腺切除术转化概率的有用性:单中心经验。
World J Surg. 2021 Jan;45(1):252-260. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05806-6. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
4
A single institution experience with robotic and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies.单机构开展机器人辅助和腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的经验
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2020 Aug 31;24(3):283-291. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.3.283.