Yayikci Yakup Ilker, Karadag Ahmet
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey.
Eurasian J Med. 2019 Feb;51(1):12-16. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.18018. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
This study aims to investigate the effects of conventional and biological drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on patients' quality of life, depression, and anxiety.
A total of 80 patients with a diagnosis of RA based on the American College of Rheumatology/Annual European Congress of Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) 2010 diagnostic criteria were included in the study. Patients were classified into two groups as follows: patients using conventional disease-modifying agents (csDMARDs) alone (Group 1, n=40) and patients using biological disease-modifying agents (bDMARDs) and a csDMARD combination (Group 2, n=40). Demographical patient data were collected. The levels of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) were measured in both groups. All patients completed the Disease Activity Score (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Beck Depression Scale (BDS), and Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS).
There was no significant difference between the two groups of patients regarding their demographical characteristics, autoantibody positivity, or DAS scores (p>0.05). HAQ scores and all parameters and summary scores of the SF-36, BDS, and HADS scores were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05).
Results of the present study showed that csDMARDs and bDMARDs, which required a more invasive administration and were associated with serious side effects, were not superior to each other in terms of their effects on patients' quality of life. csDMARD and bDMARD were also not superior to each other regarding their effects on anxiety and depression among patients with RA.
本研究旨在调查用于治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的传统药物和生物药物对患者生活质量、抑郁和焦虑的影响。
本研究纳入了80例根据2010年美国风湿病学会/欧洲风湿病学年会(ACR/EULAR)诊断标准确诊为RA的患者。患者分为两组:单独使用传统改善病情抗风湿药(csDMARDs)的患者(第1组,n = 40)和使用生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)与csDMARD联合用药的患者(第2组,n = 40)。收集患者的人口统计学数据。两组均检测类风湿因子(RF)和抗环瓜氨酸肽(抗CCP)水平。所有患者均完成疾病活动评分(DAS28)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)、简明健康调查问卷(SF - 36)、贝克抑郁量表(BDS)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。
两组患者在人口统计学特征、自身抗体阳性率或DAS评分方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。两组之间的HAQ评分以及SF - 36、BDS和HADS评分的所有参数及总分均无显著差异(p>0.05)。
本研究结果表明,需要更具侵入性给药且伴有严重副作用的csDMARDs和bDMARDs在对患者生活质量的影响方面并不优于彼此。在对RA患者的焦虑和抑郁影响方面,csDMARD和bDMARD也不优于彼此。