Suppr超能文献

对判断广延性和强度性感觉量值比例能力的测试。

Tests of the abilities to judge ratios of extensive and intensive sensory magnitudes.

作者信息

Masin Sergio Cesare, Brancaccio Andrea, Tomassetti Andrea

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Aug;81(6):2102-2119. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01710-x.

Abstract

The assumption that people are able to numerically judge ratios of sensory magnitude is often used to scale sensations. In this study, we tested this assumption for the extensive sensation of length and the intensive sensations of heaviness and brightness. A ratio model fit judged length ratios accurately and fit judged heaviness and brightness ratios inaccurately. Also, most participants could not judge brightness ratios, even if they seemed able to respond nonverbally to the brightness ratios. These results suggest that people may generally be able to judge extensity ratios but not intensity ratios. Participants used auxiliary judgment operations to compensate for their lack of ability to judge intensity ratios. These auxiliary, nonratio operations were found to yield linear scales of intensive sensory magnitude.

摘要

人们能够对感觉量值的比率进行数字判断这一假设常被用于对感觉进行量化。在本研究中,我们针对长度的广延性感觉以及重量和亮度的强度性感觉对这一假设进行了测试。一个比率模型能够准确拟合判断出的长度比率,但在拟合判断出的重量和亮度比率时并不准确。此外,即使大多数参与者似乎能够以非言语方式对亮度比率做出反应,但他们仍无法判断亮度比率。这些结果表明,人们通常可能能够判断广延性比率,但无法判断强度比率。参与者使用辅助判断操作来弥补他们在判断强度比率方面的能力不足。结果发现,这些辅助性的、非比率性操作能够产生强度性感觉量值的线性量表。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验