Suppr超能文献

定量血流比在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者非罪犯病变即刻评估中的应用:iSTEMI 亚研究。

Quantitative flow ratio for immediate assessment of nonculprit lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-An iSTEMI substudy.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):686-692. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28208. Epub 2019 Mar 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) assessment of nonculprit lesions (NCLs) based on acute setting angiograms obtained in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with QFR, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in the staged setting as reference.

BACKGROUND

QFR is an angiography-based approach for the functional evaluation of coronary artery lesions.

METHODS

This was a post-hoc analysis of the iSTEMI study. NCLs were assessed with iFR in the acute setting and with iFR and FFR at staged (median 13 days) follow-up. Acute and staged QFR values were computed in a core laboratory based on the coronary angiography recordings. Diagnostic cut-off values were ≤0.80 for QFR and FFR, and ≤0.89 for iFR.

RESULTS

Staged iFR and FFR data were available for 146 NCLs in 112 patients in the iSTEMI study. Among these, QFR analysis was feasible in 103 (71%) lesions assessed in the acute setting with a mean QFR value of 0.82 (IQR: 0.73-0.91). Staged QFR, FFR, and iFR were 0.80 (IQR: 0.70-0.90), 0.81 (IQR: 0.71-0.88), and 0.91 (IQR: 0.87-0.96), respectively. Classification agreement of acute and staged QFR was 93% (95%Cl: 87-99). The classification agreement of acute QFR was 84% (95%CI: 76-90) using staged FFR as reference and 74% (95%CI: 65-83) using staged iFR as reference.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute QFR showed a very good diagnostic performance with staged QFR as reference, a good diagnostic performance with staged FFR as reference, and a moderate diagnostic performance with staged iFR as reference.

摘要

目的

我们评估了基于急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者血管造影获得的非罪犯病变(NCL)定量血流比(QFR)评估的诊断性能,将其与分期设置中的血流储备分数(FFR)和瞬时无波比(iFR)作为参考。

背景

QFR 是一种基于血管造影的冠状动脉病变功能评估方法。

方法

这是 iSTEMI 研究的事后分析。NCL 在急性时使用 iFR 进行评估,并在分期(中位数 13 天)随访时使用 iFR 和 FFR 进行评估。急性和分期 QFR 值在核心实验室根据冠状动脉造影记录进行计算。QFR 和 FFR 的诊断截断值为≤0.80,iFR 的诊断截断值为≤0.89。

结果

在 iSTEMI 研究中,112 例患者的 146 个 NCL 有分期 iFR 和 FFR 数据。其中,103 个(71%)在急性时进行了 QFR 分析,平均 QFR 值为 0.82(IQR:0.73-0.91)。分期 QFR、FFR 和 iFR 分别为 0.80(IQR:0.70-0.90)、0.81(IQR:0.71-0.88)和 0.91(IQR:0.87-0.96)。急性和分期 QFR 的分类一致性为 93%(95%CI:87-99)。以分期 FFR 为参考时,急性 QFR 的分类一致性为 84%(95%CI:76-90),以分期 iFR 为参考时为 74%(95%CI:65-83)。

结论

急性 QFR 与分期 QFR 作为参考时具有非常好的诊断性能,与分期 FFR 作为参考时具有良好的诊断性能,与分期 iFR 作为参考时具有中等的诊断性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验