1st Cardiology Department, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Ipsilantou Str. 45-47, 10676, Athens, Greece.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Dec;39(12):2567-2574. doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02967-y. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new angiography-based coronary physiology tool aimed to evaluate functional relevance of intermediate coronary lesions. Aim of the study is to assess diagnostic performance of QFR in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in comparison to currently used non-hyperaemic pressure ratios (NHPRs). In this prospective, single-centre study, coronary physiology of intermediate coronary stenoses of non-culprit vessels in patients presenting with NSTE-ACS was evaluated using NHPRs (iFR, DFR or RFR). Subsequently, QFR was computed offline by a QFR analyst blinded to the NHPR results. Diagnostic performance of QFR was assessed in comparison to NHPRs as reference standard. A total of 60 vessels with intermediate coronary stenoses was investigated. The NHPRs were used as follows: RFR 38%, DFR 47% and iFR 15% of the cases. The NHPR result was positive, showing significant lesion, in 19 cases. A significant correlation was found between NHPR and QFR (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Classification agreement of the two methods (95%) and diagnostic performance of QFR in comparison to NHPR (AUC: 0.962 [0.914-1.00]) were both high. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of QFR in comparison to NHPR were 84.2%, 100%, 100% and 93.2% respectively. QFR has high diagnostic performance in detecting functionally significant lesions of non-culprit arteries in patients with NSTE-ACS and multivessel disease. Due to its high negative predictive value, it can be used to safely avoid unnecessary invasive physiological assessment of these lesions.
定量血流比(QFR)是一种新的基于血管造影的冠状动脉生理学工具,旨在评估中度冠状动脉病变的功能相关性。本研究旨在评估 QFR 在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者中的诊断性能,并与目前使用的非充血性压力比(NHPR)进行比较。在这项前瞻性、单中心研究中,使用 NHPR(iFR、DFR 或 RFR)评估了 NSTE-ACS 患者非罪犯血管中度冠状动脉狭窄的冠状动脉生理学。随后,由 QFR 分析员在不了解 NHPR 结果的情况下离线计算 QFR。以 NHPR 为参考标准,评估 QFR 的诊断性能。共研究了 60 个中度冠状动脉狭窄的血管。NHPR 的使用情况如下:RFR 为 38%,DFR 为 47%,iFR 为 15%。NHPR 结果为阳性,显示病变显著的有 19 例。NHPR 与 QFR 之间存在显著相关性(r=0.84,p<0.001)。两种方法的分类一致性(95%)和 QFR 与 NHPR 比较的诊断性能(AUC:0.962[0.914-1.00])均较高。与 NHPR 相比,QFR 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 84.2%、100%、100%和 93.2%。QFR 在检测 NSTE-ACS 合并多支血管病变患者非罪犯血管中功能显著病变方面具有较高的诊断性能。由于其阴性预测值较高,可安全避免对这些病变进行不必要的有创生理学评估。