• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[临床诊断实验室的外部质量评估。可能的误差来源。]

[External quality assessment of clinical diagnostic laboratories. Possible sources of error.].

作者信息

Mukhamedjanova N I, Aripov O A

机构信息

Tashkent Institute of Postgraduate medical education, Tashkent, 100007, Uzbekistan.

出版信息

Klin Lab Diagn. 2019;64(1):42-45. doi: 10.18821/0869-2084-2019-64-1-42-45.

DOI:10.18821/0869-2084-2019-64-1-42-45
PMID:30912883
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of laboratory research, its problem areas and potential improvements using the example of a number of regional clinical diagnostic laboratories in the Tashkent region and the comparability of laboratory analysis data obtained in various laboratories. We have evaluated the quality of laboratory tests in 40 clinical diagnostic laboratories of the Tashkent region. The control was carried out on 9 biochemical parameters of blood. In our studies using the control serum, the results were deplorable: the error was 50% in determining the OB and glucose, and the correct results were obtained in only 30% of the laboratories; biliru-bin - unreliable results were issued in 40% of laboratories, ALT - in 45%, and creatinin in 60%. Moreover, the results were issued in different units. The coefficient of variation (CV) was used to assess the convergence, reproducibility and accuracy of measurements of laboratory parameters in the control material and patient samples. The results of the study showed that its value exceeded the recommended maximum permissible coefficient of variation when measuring concentration levels for more than half of the studied components.

摘要

本研究的目的是以上述塔什干地区多个区域临床诊断实验室为例,评估实验室研究的质量、存在问题的领域及潜在改进措施,以及各实验室获得的实验室分析数据的可比性。我们评估了塔什干地区40家临床诊断实验室的检验质量。对血液的9项生化参数进行了质控。在我们使用对照血清的研究中,结果令人堪忧:在测定总胆红素(OB)和葡萄糖时误差为50%,只有30%的实验室获得了正确结果;40%的实验室胆红素结果不可靠,45%的实验室谷丙转氨酶(ALT)结果不可靠,60%的实验室肌酐结果不可靠。此外,结果以不同单位给出。变异系数(CV)用于评估对照物质和患者样本中实验室参数测量的一致性、可重复性和准确性。研究结果表明,在测量超过一半的研究成分的浓度水平时,其值超过了推荐的最大允许变异系数。

相似文献

1
[External quality assessment of clinical diagnostic laboratories. Possible sources of error.].[临床诊断实验室的外部质量评估。可能的误差来源。]
Klin Lab Diagn. 2019;64(1):42-45. doi: 10.18821/0869-2084-2019-64-1-42-45.
2
Carryover: More than just a major hangover for the clinical laboratory.残留效应:对临床实验室而言,远不止是严重的宿醉影响。
Clin Biochem. 2016 Jul;49(10-11):735-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 May 21.
3
National continuous surveys on internal quality control for HbA1c in 306 clinical laboratories of China from 2012 to 2016: Continual improvement.2012年至2016年中国306家临床实验室糖化血红蛋白室内质量控制的全国性持续调查:持续改进
J Clin Lab Anal. 2017 Sep;31(5). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22099. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
[Comparability study of analytical results between a group of clinical laboratories].[一组临床实验室分析结果的可比性研究]
Rev Calid Asist. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
5
Quality Indicators for the Total Testing Process.全检测流程的质量指标
Clin Lab Med. 2017 Mar;37(1):187-205. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
6
National Survey of Adult and Pediatric Reference Intervals in Clinical Laboratories across Canada: A Report of the CSCC Working Group on Reference Interval Harmonization.加拿大临床实验室成人及儿科参考区间全国性调查:加拿大临床化学协会参考区间协调工作组报告
Clin Biochem. 2017 Nov;50(16-17):925-935. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
7
ASVCP guidelines: allowable total error guidelines for biochemistry.美国兽医临床病理学家协会指南:生物化学的允许总误差指南
Vet Clin Pathol. 2013 Dec;42(4):424-36. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12101.
8
The Empower project - a new way of assessing and monitoring test comparability and stability.赋能项目——一种评估和监测检测可比性与稳定性的新方法。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Jul;53(8):1197-204. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0959.
9
Impact of quality control accepted inter-laboratory variations on calculated Fibrotest/Actitest scores for the non-invasive biochemical assessment of liver fibrosis.质量控制认可的实验室间差异对用于肝纤维化无创生化评估的Fibrotest/Actitest评分计算结果的影响。
Clin Chim Acta. 2009 Nov;409(1-2):90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
10
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: the status of the progress of IFCC Working Group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" project.临床实验室检验质量指标:国际临床化学联合会工作组“检验误差及患者安全”项目进展状况。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):348-357. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0929.