Heimburger D C, Young V R, Bistrian B R, Ettinger W H, Lipschitz D A, Rudman D
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1986 Jul-Aug;10(4):425-30. doi: 10.1177/0148607186010004425.
In its proposed classification scheme for reimbursement for enteral feeding formulas, the United States Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) has neglected to consider the importance of making available formulas of varying protein content. In responding to HCFA's proposal, this consensus report reviews information currently available regarding different protein requirements in healthy, ill, and undernourished adults and elderly individuals. HCFA's reimbursement guidelines should reflect sound medical and nutritional practice rather than influencing it adversely, which its original proposal could do. Clinicians should have at their disposal enteral feeding formulas of varying protein/calorie ratios, especially since the following groups often have higher than average protein requirements relative to calorie requirements: the elderly, individuals with physiologic stress such as infection and injury, and patients with protein-calorie undernutrition.
在其关于肠内营养配方食品报销的拟议分类方案中,美国医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)忽视了提供不同蛋白质含量配方食品的重要性。在回应HCFA的提议时,本共识报告回顾了目前可获得的有关健康、患病和营养不良的成年人及老年人不同蛋白质需求的信息。HCFA的报销指南应反映合理的医学和营养实践,而不是对其产生不利影响,但其最初的提议可能会这样做。临床医生应能使用不同蛋白质/热量比的肠内营养配方食品,特别是因为以下人群相对于热量需求而言,往往有高于平均水平的蛋白质需求:老年人、患有感染和损伤等生理应激的个体以及蛋白质热量营养不良的患者。