Al-Sulaiti Fatima Khalifa, Nader Ahmed Mohamed, Saad Mohamed Omar, Shaukat Adila, Parakadavathu Rakesh, Elzubair Ahmed, Al-Badriyeh Daoud, Elewa Hazem, Awaisu Ahmed
Clinical Pharmacy and Practice Section, College of Pharmacy, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Qatar National Research Fund, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019 Oct;44(5):639-652. doi: 10.1007/s13318-019-00551-1.
Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is based on achieving 24-h area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration cure breakpoints (AUC/MIC). Approaches to vancomycin TDM vary, with no head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparisons to date.
We aimed to compare clinical and pharmacokinetic outcomes between peak-trough-based and trough-only-based vancomycin TDM approaches and to determine the relationship between vancomycin AUC/MIC and cure rates.
A multicentered pragmatic parallel-group RCT was conducted in Hamad Medical Corporation hospitals in Qatar. Adult non-dialysis patients initiated on vancomycin were randomized to peak-trough-based or trough-only-based vancomycin TDM. Primary endpoints included vancomycin AUC/MIC ratio breakpoint for cure and clinical effectiveness (therapeutic cure vs therapeutic failure). Descriptive, inferential, and classification and regression tree (CART) statistical analyses were applied. NONMEM.v.7.3 was used to conduct population pharmacokinetic analyses and AUC calculations.
Sixty-five patients were enrolled [trough-only-based-TDM (n = 35) and peak-trough-based-TDM (n = 30)]. Peak-trough-based TDM was significantly associated with higher therapeutic cure rates compared to trough-only-based TDM [76.7% vs 48.6%; p value = 0.02]. No statistically significant differences were observed for all-cause mortality, neutropenia, or nephrotoxicity between the two groups. Compared to trough-only-based TDM, peak-trough-based TDM was associated with less vancomycin total daily doses by 12.05 mg/kg/day (p value = 0.027). CART identified creatinine clearance (CL), AUC/MIC, and TDM approach as significant determinants of therapeutic outcomes. All patients [n = 19,100%] with CL ≤ 7.85 L/h, AUC/MIC ≤ 1256, who received peak-trough-based TDM achieved therapeutic cure. AUC/MIC > 565 was identified to be correlated with cure in trough-only-based TDM recipients [n = 11,84.6%]. No minimum AUC/MIC breakpoint was detected by CART in the peak-trough-based group.
Maintenance of target vancomycin exposures and implementation of peak-trough-based vancomycin TDM may improve vancomycin-associated cure rates. Larger scale RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.
万古霉素治疗药物监测(TDM)基于实现24小时浓度-时间曲线下面积与最低抑菌浓度治疗突破点(AUC/MIC)。万古霉素TDM的方法各不相同,迄今为止尚无直接的随机对照试验(RCT)比较。
我们旨在比较基于峰谷和仅基于谷值的万古霉素TDM方法的临床和药代动力学结果,并确定万古霉素AUC/MIC与治愈率之间的关系。
在卡塔尔的哈马德医疗公司医院进行了一项多中心实用平行组RCT。开始使用万古霉素的成年非透析患者被随机分为基于峰谷或仅基于谷值的万古霉素TDM。主要终点包括万古霉素AUC/MIC比值治愈断点和临床有效性(治疗治愈与治疗失败)。应用描述性、推断性以及分类和回归树(CART)统计分析。使用NONMEM.v.7.3进行群体药代动力学分析和AUC计算。
共纳入65例患者[仅基于谷值的TDM组(n = 35)和基于峰谷的TDM组(n = 30)]。与仅基于谷值的TDM相比,基于峰谷的TDM与更高的治疗治愈率显著相关[76.7%对48.6%;p值 = 0.02]。两组在全因死亡率、中性粒细胞减少或肾毒性方面未观察到统计学显著差异。与仅基于谷值的TDM相比,基于峰谷的TDM使万古霉素每日总剂量减少12.05mg/kg/天(p值 = 0.027)。CART分析确定肌酐清除率(CL)、AUC/MIC和TDM方法是治疗结果的重要决定因素。所有CL≤7.85L/h、AUC/MIC≤1256且接受基于峰谷TDM的患者[n = 19,100%]均实现治疗治愈。在仅基于谷值的TDM接受者中,AUC/MIC>565与治愈相关[n = 11,84.6%]。CART分析在基于峰谷的组中未检测到最低AUC/MIC断点。
维持目标万古霉素暴露水平并实施基于峰谷的万古霉素TDM可能提高万古霉素相关的治愈率。需要更大规模的RCT来证实这些发现。