Quantitative Analysis of Paralyzed Lower Eyelid Elevation Technique: Suspension Sling versus Supporting Midcheek Lift.

BACKGROUND

Restoration of paralytic lower eyelid retraction is challenging in the surgical management of facial paralysis. In this study, quantitative measurements were compared between the suspension sling and lower eyelid-supporting midcheek lift techniques.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2016, 36 operations were performed on 28 patients with a mean age of 45.6 years (range, 7 to 80 years), a mean denervation time of 13.5 years (range, 0.2 to 44 years), and a mean follow-up period of 636 days (range, 261 to 1143 days). The surgical techniques included autologous tendon sling (n = 9), Mitek suspension (n = 12), and midcheek lift (n = 15). The distance from the pupil center to the lower eyelid margin was measured, and the ratio of the distance on the paralyzed side to that on the normal side was analyzed.

RESULTS

The change in the ratio between the paralyzed side and the normal side was 0.098 (from 1.264 to 1.166; p = 0.353) in the autologous tendon sling group, 0.104 (from 1.231 to 1.127; p = 0.243) in the Mitek suspension group (p = 0.05), and 0.179 (from 1.234 to 1.055; p = 0.038) in the midcheek lift group. Two patients in the Mitek suspension group developed foreign body infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The midcheek lift group showed the greatest change in the ratio between the distance from the pupil center to the eyelid margin on the paralyzed side and that on the normal side. Eyelid-supporting midcheek lift is superior to suspension sling for restoration of paralytic eyelid retraction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.