Lin Wei-Lin, Lee Meei-Shyuan, Wong Chih-Shung, Chan Shun-Ming, Lai Hou-Chuan, Wu Zhi-Fu, Lu Chueng-He
Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center.
School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(13):e15074. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015074.
As reported, patients experience less postoperative pain after propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). In the present study, we investigated the postoperative analgesic effects between propofol-based TIVA and desflurane anesthesia after spine surgery.
Sixty patients were included who received (surgical time >180 minutes) lumbar spine surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either TIVA (with target-controlled infusion) with propofol/fentanyl-based anesthesia (TIVA group) or desflurane/fentanyl-based anesthesia (DES group), titrated to maintain Bispectral Index values between 45 and 55. All patients received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl for postoperative pain relief. Numeric pain rating scale (NRS) pain scores, postoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative rescue tramadol use, and fentanyl-related side effects were recorded.
The TIVA group patients reported lower NRS pain scores during coughing on postoperative day 1 but not day 2 and 3 (P = .002, P = .133, P = .161, respectively). Less fentanyl consumption was observed on postoperative days 1 and 2, but not on day 3 (375 μg vs 485 μg, P = .032, 414 μg vs 572 μg, P = .033, and 421 μg vs 479 μg, P = .209, respectively), less cumulative fentanyl consumption at postoperative 48 hours (790 μg vs 1057 μg, P = .004) and 72 hours (1210 μg vs 1536 μg, P = .004), and total fentanyl consumption (1393 μg vs 1704 μg, P = .007) when compared with the DES group. No difference was found in rescue tramadol use and fentanyl-related side effects.
Patients anesthetized with propofol-based TIVA reported less pain during coughing and consumed less daily and total PCA fentanyl after lumbar spine surgery.
据报道,接受丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉(TIVA)的患者术后疼痛较轻。在本研究中,我们调查了脊柱手术后丙泊酚TIVA与地氟烷麻醉之间的术后镇痛效果。
纳入60例接受腰椎手术(手术时间>180分钟)的患者。患者被随机分配接受丙泊酚/芬太尼为基础的TIVA(采用靶控输注)麻醉(TIVA组)或地氟烷/芬太尼为基础的麻醉(DES组),滴定维持脑电双频指数值在45至55之间。所有患者术后均接受芬太尼患者自控镇痛(PCA)以缓解疼痛。记录数字疼痛评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分、术后芬太尼消耗量、术后补救性曲马多使用情况以及芬太尼相关副作用。
TIVA组患者在术后第1天咳嗽时的NRS疼痛评分较低,但在第2天和第3天无差异(分别为P = 0.002、P = 0.133、P = 0.161)。术后第1天和第2天观察到芬太尼消耗量较少,但第3天无差异(分别为375μg对485μg,P = 0.032;414μg对572μg,P = 0.033;421μg对479μg,P = 0.209),术后48小时(790μg对1057μg,P = 0.004)和72小时(1210μg对1536μg,P = 0.004)的芬太尼累积消耗量较少,与DES组相比,芬太尼总消耗量也较少(1393μg对1704μg,P = 0.007)。在补救性曲马多使用情况和芬太尼相关副作用方面未发现差异。
接受丙泊酚TIVA麻醉的患者在腰椎手术后咳嗽时疼痛较轻,且每日和PCA芬太尼总消耗量较少。