Li Zi-Hui, Chen Xi, Sun Xu, Wang Bin, Zhu Ze-Zhang, Qian Bang-Ping, Liu Zhen, Yu Yang, Qiu Yong
Department of Spinal Surgery, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, China;
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):234-238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.008.
To compare the sagittal morphological features of the spine and pelvis between L₅S₁ dysplastic spondylolisthesis and isthmus spondylolisthesis in adolescent.
Retrospective analysis of 24 cases of adolescent L₅S₁ spondylolisthesis with complete imaging data from May 2002 to December 2016. Those included 8 males and 16 females, aged from 10 to 18 years old with an average of (13.4±2.0) years. Among them, 9 cases were diagnosed as dysplastic spondylolisthesis (dysplasia group) and 15 cases isthmic spondylolisthesis (ischemic group). Radiographic parameters including slippage distance, slippage degree, slippage angle, sagittal vertical axis(SVA), thoracic kyphosis(TK), lumbar lordosis(LL), L₅ incidence(L₅I), pelvic incidence(PI), pelvic tilt(PT), sacral slope(SS), sagittal pelvic thickness(SPT), lumbosacral angle (LSA), sacral table angle (STA) were measured on the spinal lateral X-ray of the standing position. Independent-samples t-test was used in the comparison of each variable between two groups. <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
There were no significant differences in slippage distance, slippage rate, slippage angle between two groups. In dysplasia group, SVA, L₅I, PT, SPT were (37.0±48.4) mm, (57.0±14.8)°, (42.3±15.4)°, (56.1±21.2) mm, respectively, and (-11.0±22.2) mm, (31.7±19.3) °, ( 15.5±10.2)°, (31.4±19.1) mm in ischemic group; and the differences between the two groups were significant(<0.05). In ischemic group, SS, LSA, STA were (44.1±12.6)°, (103.9±21.7)°, (92.7±9.9)°, respectively, and (25.9±20.2) °, (75.4±16.4) °, (75.4±9.7) ° in dysplasia group; and the differences between the two groups were significant(<0.05). There was no significant difference in TK, LL between two groups(>0.05).
Significant different from isthmic spondylolisthesis, adolescents with dysplastic spondylolisthesis present a different spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, characterized with trunk forward leaning and pelvic retroversion. In case of sagittal imbalance, early surgical intervention is required to restore a balanced spino-pelvic alignment.
比较青少年L₅S₁发育不良性椎体滑脱与峡部裂性椎体滑脱的脊柱和骨盆矢状面形态特征。
回顾性分析2002年5月至2016年12月期间有完整影像资料的24例青少年L₅S₁椎体滑脱病例。其中男性8例,女性16例,年龄10至18岁,平均(13.4±2.0)岁。其中9例诊断为发育不良性椎体滑脱(发育不良组),15例为峡部裂性椎体滑脱(峡部裂组)。在站立位脊柱侧位X线片上测量包括滑脱距离、滑脱程度、滑脱角、矢状垂直轴(SVA)、胸椎后凸(TK)、腰椎前凸(LL)、L₅倾斜角(L₅I)、骨盆倾斜角(PI)、骨盆倾斜(PT)、骶骨倾斜度(SS)、骨盆矢状厚度(SPT)、腰骶角(LSA)、骶骨平台角(STA)等影像学参数。两组间各变量比较采用独立样本t检验。P<0.05认为差异有统计学意义。
两组间滑脱距离、滑脱率、滑脱角差异无统计学意义。发育不良组SVA、L₅I、PT、SPT分别为(37.0±48.4)mm、(57.0±14.8)°、(42.3±15.4)°、(56.1±21.2)mm,峡部裂组分别为(-11.0±22.2)mm、(31.7±19.3)°、(15.5±10.2)°、(31.4±19.1)mm;两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。峡部裂组SS、LSA、STA分别为(44.1±12.6)°、(103.9±21.7)°、(92.7±9.9)°,发育不良组分别为(25.9±20.2)°、(75.4±16.4)°、(75.4±9.7)°;两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组间TK、LL差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
与峡部裂性椎体滑脱明显不同,发育不良性椎体滑脱的青少年表现出不同的脊柱-骨盆矢状面排列,其特征为躯干前倾和骨盆后倾。出现矢状面失衡时,需要早期手术干预以恢复平衡的脊柱-骨盆排列。