Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedics, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
J Invest Surg. 2021 Nov;34(11):1256-1261. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1593557. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
Loss of reduction is the most common complication after acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treated with the suture-button. Some predictors of it are known, but finding new predictors is an ongoing process. In this study, we evaluate the importance of the position of the coracoid button.
Between April 2010 and February 2017, 186 patients with AC joint dislocation were identified. All patients were managed with the same surgical technique and postoperative protocol. The position of the coracoid button was determined immediately after surgery by anterior-posterior views of the operated shoulder and was classified as medial (Group A, 42 cases), central (Group B, 85 cases) and lateral (Group C, 59 cases) positions. The main outcome measurement was loss of reduction. The main analysis was the association between the coracoid button position and loss of reduction.
No significant difference was found in the baseline characteristics among 3 groups. During follow-up, there were 15 cases (35.7%) developing loss of reduction in Group A, 5 cases (5.9%) in Group B and 26 cases (44.1%) in Group C. The rate of loss of reduction in Groups A and C were higher than that in Group B ( < .05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the rate of reduction loss between lateral and medial positions of the coracoid buttons ( > .05).
Our results indicated that both lateral and medial positions of the coracoid buttons could predict loss of reduction in AC joint dislocation patients treated with the suture-button.
采用缝合纽扣治疗肩锁关节(AC)脱位后,最常见的并发症是复位丢失。已知一些预测因素,但寻找新的预测因素是一个持续的过程。在这项研究中,我们评估了喙突纽扣位置的重要性。
2010 年 4 月至 2017 年 2 月,共确定了 186 例 AC 关节脱位患者。所有患者均采用相同的手术技术和术后方案进行治疗。术后立即通过手术肩的前后视图确定喙突纽扣的位置,并将其分类为内侧(A 组,42 例)、中央(B 组,85 例)和外侧(C 组,59 例)位置。主要观察指标为复位丢失。主要分析是喙突纽扣位置与复位丢失之间的关系。
3 组间基线特征无显著差异。在随访期间,A 组 15 例(35.7%)、B 组 5 例(5.9%)和 C 组 26 例(44.1%)发生复位丢失。A 组和 C 组的复位丢失率高于 B 组( < .05)。此外,喙突纽扣的外侧和内侧位置的复位丢失率无显著差异( > .05)。
我们的结果表明,采用缝合纽扣治疗肩锁关节脱位患者时,喙突纽扣的外侧和内侧位置都可以预测复位丢失。