Department of Surgery, Universidad de La Frontera, Chile; Center of Excellence in Morphological and Surgical Studies (CEMyQ), Universidad de La Frontera, Chile; PhD Program in Medical Sciences, Universidad de La Frontera, Chile.
PhD Program in Medical Sciences, Universidad de La Frontera, Chile; Faculty of Medicine, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador.
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Nov;21(11):1427-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
Equipoise exists regarding the benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC). The aim of this study was to critically review the available evidence for the effectiveness of AT in patients with GBC following surgery with curative intent.
A systematic review was performed. Relevant studies were identified from Trip Database, BIREME-BVS, SciELO, Cochrane Central Register, WoS, MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS. Adjuvant therapies considered included chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and radiotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Subgorup analysis of patients with positive lymph node disease (PLND), positive surgical margin (PSM), or advanced stage (AS) were performed.
748 related articles were identified; 27 met the selection criteria (3 systematic reviews and 24 observational studies). Evidence provided was moderate, poor and very poor for chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and radiotherapy. Existing evidence is not robust, but suggests certain benefits with AT in improving OS, especially in patients with PLND, PSM and AS.
Results do not provide strong evidence that AT is effective in patients who undergo resection for GBC. Subgroups of PLND and PSM may have a survival advantage. Future studies with appropriate internal validity and adequate number of patients are required to better answer this question.
对于胆囊癌(GBC)患者辅助治疗(AT)的益处存在争议。本研究旨在批判性地回顾有手术根治性切除的 GBC 患者接受 AT 的有效性的现有证据。
进行了系统评价。从 Trip Database、BIREME-BVS、SciELO、Cochrane 中央注册处、WoS、MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 SCOPUS 中确定了相关研究。考虑的辅助治疗包括化疗、放化疗和放疗。主要结局是总生存(OS)。对有阳性淋巴结疾病(PLND)、阳性手术切缘(PSM)或晚期(AS)的患者进行亚组分析。
共确定了 748 篇相关文章,27 篇符合选择标准(3 项系统评价和 24 项观察性研究)。化疗、放化疗和放疗的证据为中等、较差和非常差。现有证据不稳健,但提示 AT 在改善 OS 方面具有一定的益处,特别是在 PLND、PSM 和 AS 患者中。
结果并未提供强有力的证据表明 AT 对接受 GBC 切除术的患者有效。PLND 和 PSM 的亚组可能具有生存优势。需要进行具有适当内部有效性和足够患者数量的未来研究,以更好地回答这个问题。