• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance.任务操作对工作记忆与 Go/No-Go 任务表现之间关系的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 May;71:39-58. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
2
Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task.进行思维过程:工作记忆容量、目标忽视与执行控制任务中的走神现象。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):196-204. doi: 10.1037/a0014104.
3
Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.工作记忆容量与反眼跳任务:目标激活与维持个体差异的微观分析-宏观分析研究
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):68-84. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000431. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
4
Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy.注意力、记忆和思维执行控制方面的个体差异及其与精神分裂症相关特征的关联。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Aug;145(8):1017-1048. doi: 10.1037/xge0000184. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
Working memory capacity and mind-wandering during low-demand cognitive tasks.低需求认知任务期间的工作记忆容量与走神
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Jul;52:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
6
Cognitive and contextual correlates of spontaneous and deliberate mind-wandering.自发与刻意走神的认知及情境关联因素
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):85-98. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000444. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.认知灵活性:睡眠剥夺导致表现障碍的一个独特因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 May;126:191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
Differential recruitment of executive resources during mind wandering.思绪游荡过程中执行资源的差异性调用。
Conscious Cogn. 2014 May;26:51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.从缓慢到“啊!”:工作记忆容量和思维漫游预测极端反应时间和执行控制错误。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):525-549. doi: 10.1037/a0025896. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
10
The neurotic wandering mind: An individual differences investigation of neuroticism, mind-wandering, and executive control.神经质的走神思维:关于神经质、走神及执行控制的个体差异研究
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Apr;70(4):649-663. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1145706. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relative Accuracy of Different Methods for Measuring Mind Wandering Subtypes: A Systematic Review.测量思维游荡亚型的不同方法的相对准确性:一项系统综述。
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70764. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70764.
2
Neural Mechanisms Supporting the Relationship between Working Memory Capacity and Proactive Control.支持工作记忆容量与主动控制之间关系的神经机制。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 12:2025.05.09.653198. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.09.653198.
3
Fast & furious: Rejecting the hypothesis that secondary psychopathy improves reaction time-based concealed information detection.快速且激烈:拒绝二级精神病态改善基于反应时间的隐藏信息检测这一假说。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 15;19(10):e0311948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311948. eCollection 2024.
4
The Effects of Working Memory versus Adaptive Visual Search Control Training on Executive Cognitive Function.工作记忆与适应性视觉搜索控制训练对执行认知功能的影响
J Cogn Enhanc. 2022 Sep;6(3):327-339. doi: 10.1007/s41465-022-00241-y. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
A computational model of prefrontal and striatal interactions in perceptual category learning.前额叶和纹状体在知觉类别学习中的相互作用的计算模型。
Brain Cogn. 2023 Jun;168:105970. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2023.105970. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Attentional disengagements in educational contexts: a diary investigation of everyday mind-wandering and distraction.教育情境中的注意力分散:一项关于日常走神和分心的日记式调查。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0070-7. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
2
Optimal go/no-go ratios to maximize false alarms.最佳的“是/否”反应比以最大化假警报。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1020-1029. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0923-5.
3
Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.工作记忆容量与反眼跳任务:目标激活与维持个体差异的微观分析-宏观分析研究
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):68-84. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000431. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
4
Prepotent motor activity and inhibitory control demands in different variants of the go/no-go paradigm.不同 Go/No-Go 范式变体中的优势运动活动和抑制控制需求。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Mar;55(3). doi: 10.1111/psyp.12871. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
5
Cognitive predictors of a common multitasking ability: Contributions from working memory, attention control, and fluid intelligence.认知预测因素对常见多重任务能力的影响:工作记忆、注意力控制和流体智力的贡献。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Nov;145(11):1473-1492. doi: 10.1037/xge0000219.
6
Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy.注意力、记忆和思维执行控制方面的个体差异及其与精神分裂症相关特征的关联。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Aug;145(8):1017-1048. doi: 10.1037/xge0000184. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention.有意与无意的走神。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):605-617. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
8
A critical examination of the evidence for sensitivity loss in modern vigilance tasks.对现代警觉任务中敏感性丧失证据的批判性审视。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Jan;123(1):70-83. doi: 10.1037/rev0000021. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
9
Daydreaming style moderates the relation between working memory and mind wandering: Integrating two hypotheses.白日梦风格调节工作记忆与走神之间的关系:整合两种假说。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Mar;42(3):451-464. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000180. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
10
A resource-control account of sustained attention: evidence from mind-wandering and vigilance paradigms.资源控制论对持续注意力的解释:来自走神和警戒范式的证据。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;10(1):82-96. doi: 10.1177/1745691614556681.

任务操作对工作记忆与 Go/No-Go 任务表现之间关系的影响。

Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance.

机构信息

Purdue University, United States.

Purdue University, United States.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2019 May;71:39-58. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.006
PMID:30928898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6488413/
Abstract

Go/no-go tasks are widely used in psychology as measures of inhibition, mind-wandering, and impulsivity, but relatively little research has explored the impact that task manipulations have on task performance and measurement of the intended psychological constructs. Experiment 1 investigated the differences between perceptual and semantic versions of go/no-go tasks and how task performance relates to individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC), a widely-studied cognitive construct. The type of decision performed on the go/no-go stimuli influenced performance, but not the relationship with WMC. Experiment 2 examined the potential of inter-stimulus interval (ISI), which influenced go/no-go performance, along with the relationships with WMC. However, the type of decision had effects on performance above and beyond that of the ISI. The results are discussed in relation to the psychological literature using go/no-go tasks as behavioral indices of inhibition and mind-wandering, and in the context of previous investigations of individual differences in WMC.

摘要

Go/no-go 任务在心理学中被广泛用作抑制、思维漫游和冲动的测量手段,但相对较少的研究探讨了任务操作对任务表现和预期心理结构测量的影响。实验 1 研究了感知和语义版本的 Go/No-Go 任务之间的差异,以及任务表现如何与工作记忆容量(WMC)的个体差异相关,WMC 是一个广泛研究的认知结构。在 Go/No-Go 刺激上执行的决策类型会影响表现,但不会影响与 WMC 的关系。实验 2 检验了刺激间间隔(ISI)的潜力,它会影响 Go/No-Go 的表现,以及与 WMC 的关系。然而,决策类型的影响超出了 ISI 的影响。结果将根据使用 Go/No-Go 任务作为抑制和思维漫游的行为指标的心理文献进行讨论,并在之前对 WMC 的个体差异的调查背景下进行讨论。