Purdue University, United States.
Purdue University, United States.
Conscious Cogn. 2019 May;71:39-58. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
Go/no-go tasks are widely used in psychology as measures of inhibition, mind-wandering, and impulsivity, but relatively little research has explored the impact that task manipulations have on task performance and measurement of the intended psychological constructs. Experiment 1 investigated the differences between perceptual and semantic versions of go/no-go tasks and how task performance relates to individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC), a widely-studied cognitive construct. The type of decision performed on the go/no-go stimuli influenced performance, but not the relationship with WMC. Experiment 2 examined the potential of inter-stimulus interval (ISI), which influenced go/no-go performance, along with the relationships with WMC. However, the type of decision had effects on performance above and beyond that of the ISI. The results are discussed in relation to the psychological literature using go/no-go tasks as behavioral indices of inhibition and mind-wandering, and in the context of previous investigations of individual differences in WMC.
Go/no-go 任务在心理学中被广泛用作抑制、思维漫游和冲动的测量手段,但相对较少的研究探讨了任务操作对任务表现和预期心理结构测量的影响。实验 1 研究了感知和语义版本的 Go/No-Go 任务之间的差异,以及任务表现如何与工作记忆容量(WMC)的个体差异相关,WMC 是一个广泛研究的认知结构。在 Go/No-Go 刺激上执行的决策类型会影响表现,但不会影响与 WMC 的关系。实验 2 检验了刺激间间隔(ISI)的潜力,它会影响 Go/No-Go 的表现,以及与 WMC 的关系。然而,决策类型的影响超出了 ISI 的影响。结果将根据使用 Go/No-Go 任务作为抑制和思维漫游的行为指标的心理文献进行讨论,并在之前对 WMC 的个体差异的调查背景下进行讨论。