Okafor Chika C, Collins Samantha L, Daniel Joseph A, Coetzee Johann F, Whitlock Brian K
Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2019 Jan;15:100258. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2018.100258. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
Anecdotally, Veterinary Feed Directive prescriptions in many states in the southeastern United States (U.S.) are written most often for treatment and prevention of bovine anaplasmosis (BA). This tick-borne disease of cattle caused by Anaplasma marginale remains an economically important disease in U.S. However, there are no prevalence estimates of this disease in Georgia (GA). Thus, this study was aimed at determining the seroprevalence of BA in GA. In an active cull beef cow screening for BA, 293 beef cows were sampled from one cattle auction barn and one slaughterhouse between May 2013 and September 2014. These cows originated from 6 of 159 counties in GA. The top 3 counties sampled were Gordon (241 samples), Carroll (25 samples), and Emanuel (12 samples). Of the 293 sampled beef cows, 13 were positive and 280 were negative for BA. Hence, with competitive ELISA, the overall observed apparent seroprevalence of BA in GA was 4.44% (95% CI: 2.61-7.44%) while the estimated true seroprevalence was 2.62% (95% CI: 5.2-5.87%). The top 2 prevalent counties were Carroll and Gordon with apparent seroprevalence of 8% (95% CI: 2.22-24.97) and 4.78% (95% CI: 2.69-8.36), respectively and estimated true seroprevalence of 6.45% (95% CI: 0-25.37) and 2.99% (95% CI: 0.54-6.89), respectively. Although not significant, counties with specimen submissions for BA testing had a greater cattle population and number of cattle farms than counties without specimen submissions. Nevertheless, future prevention and control measures for BA should out of caution target counties with ≥5000 total cattle heads.
据传闻,在美国东南部许多州,兽医饲料指令处方大多是为治疗和预防牛无浆体病(BA)而开具的。这种由边缘无浆体引起的牛蜱传疾病在美国仍然是一种具有经济重要性的疾病。然而,佐治亚州(GA)尚无该疾病的流行率估计。因此,本研究旨在确定佐治亚州牛无浆体病的血清阳性率。在一项针对牛无浆体病的现役淘汰肉牛筛查中,2013年5月至2014年9月期间,从一个牲畜拍卖场和一个屠宰场采集了293头肉牛的样本。这些奶牛来自佐治亚州159个县中的6个县。采样最多的前三个县分别是戈登县(241个样本)、卡罗尔县(25个样本)和伊曼纽尔县(12个样本)。在293头采样肉牛中,13头牛无浆体病检测呈阳性,280头呈阴性。因此,采用竞争ELISA法,佐治亚州牛无浆体病总体观察到的表观血清阳性率为4.44%(95%置信区间:2.61 - 7.44%),而估计的真实血清阳性率为2.62%(95%置信区间:5.2 - 5.87%)。流行率最高的前两个县是卡罗尔县和戈登县,表观血清阳性率分别为8%(95%置信区间:2.22 - 24.97)和4.78%(95%置信区间:2.69 - 8.36),估计的真实血清阳性率分别为6.45%(95%置信区间:0 - 25.37)和2.99%(95%置信区间:0.54 - 6.89)。虽然不显著,但提交牛无浆体病检测样本的县比未提交样本的县拥有更多的牛群数量和养牛场数量。尽管如此,出于谨慎考虑,未来牛无浆体病的预防和控制措施应以总牛头数≥5000头的县为目标。