Research Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Institute of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Division of Surgery, Northwick Park Institute of Medical Research Campus, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(5):577-592. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190329124214.
Preterm birth is the major cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Attempts to reduce the burden may be proactive using biochemical or biophysical prediction and preventative measures. If these efforts fail, then the approach may have to be reactive using tocolytics to inhibit spontaneous preterm labour.
We have reviewed the evidence concerning the safety and efficacy of various classes of tocolytic agents.
The evidence to support the use of magnesium sulfate or nitric oxide donors as a tocolytic is poor. Compared to placebo or no treatment, there is evidence to support the efficacy of calcium channel blockers (mainly nifedipine), prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors (mainly indomethacin and sulindac), oxytocin receptor antagonists (mainly atosiban) and β2-agonists (mainly ritodrine, terbutaline, salbutamol and fenoterol). Maternal safety concerns have reduced the use of β2-agonists. Fetal safety and gestational age restrictions have largely condemned prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors to second-line therapy. First-line therapy in Europe and other parts of the world outside the USA and Australia is limited to calcium channel blockers and oxytocin receptor antagonists. With respect to efficacy, atosiban and nifedipine are similar, but the robustness of the evidence favours atosiban. With respect to safety, atosiban is clearly the safest tocolytic as there are fetomaternal concerns with nifedipine, particularly in high daily doses.
The perfect tocolytic that is uniformly effective and safe does not exist. Cost, licensing and informed consent are considerations involved in the choice. Efforts continue to develop and introduce other or better agents, including novel compounds such as progesterone, PGF2α antagonists and statins.
早产是全球围产期死亡和发病的主要原因。为了减轻这一负担,可以通过生化或生物物理预测和预防措施进行积极主动的尝试。如果这些努力失败,那么可能需要使用宫缩抑制剂来抑制自发性早产,采取被动的方法。
我们回顾了各种类别的宫缩抑制剂的安全性和疗效证据。
支持硫酸镁或一氧化氮供体作为宫缩抑制剂的证据不足。与安慰剂或不治疗相比,有证据支持钙通道阻滞剂(主要是硝苯地平)、前列腺素合成酶抑制剂(主要是吲哚美辛和舒林酸)、催产素受体拮抗剂(主要是阿托西班)和β2-激动剂(主要是利托君、特布他林、沙丁胺醇和非诺特罗)的疗效。对母体安全性的担忧减少了β2-激动剂的使用。胎儿安全性和胎龄限制使前列腺素合成酶抑制剂主要限于二线治疗。在欧洲和美国和澳大利亚以外的世界其他地区,一线治疗仅限于钙通道阻滞剂和催产素受体拮抗剂。就疗效而言,阿托西班和硝苯地平相似,但证据的稳健性有利于阿托西班。就安全性而言,阿托西班显然是最安全的宫缩抑制剂,因为硝苯地平存在胎儿-母体的担忧,特别是在高日剂量下。
并不存在一种普遍有效且安全的理想宫缩抑制剂。成本、许可和知情同意是选择中的考虑因素。目前仍在努力开发和引入其他或更好的药物,包括新型化合物如孕酮、PGF2α 拮抗剂和他汀类药物。