Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 September/October;34(5):1184–1194. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7399. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
This follow-up study evaluated the implant success rate and marginal bone response of submerged and non-submerged osteoconductive two-piece implants with a moderately rough implant neck in thick and thin gingival biotypes.
The stability of the hard tissue surrounding the implants was evaluated, based on clinical and radiographic examinations performed after implant placement and every follow-up thereafter. The clinical data were processed via linear mixed-effects model statistics at the patient level.
Forty-three edentulous and partially edentulous patients were treated with a total of 97 implants with an osteoconductive surface. After 2 years in function, all the implants and dental prostheses reached a 100% success rate according to predefined criteria. Taking implantation as a baseline, the mean change in the marginal bone level (ΔMBLp) after 2 years in function was -0.36 mm (SD: 0.55), and bone resorption higher than 1 mm and less than 2.5 mm was observed for seven implants. Taking dental prosthesis placement as a baseline, the ΔMBLp after 2 years of loading was -0.13 mm (SD: 0.39), and bone resorption higher than 1 mm and less than 2.0 mm was observed only for two implants. Statistically significant differences in mean marginal bone loss were observed in the gingival biotype (P = .006) and submersion (P < .05). Their influence on the dynamics of peri-implant bone loss during the process of biologic width restoration was analyzed.
This study demonstrated the high stability of peri-implant hard tissue and the 100% success rate of the implant system with a moderately rough neck. The biotype and implant submersion were evaluated as factors having a significant influence on marginal bone loss.
本随访研究评估了具有中度粗糙颈部的骨传导性两段式种植体在厚龈型和薄龈型中的植入成功率和边缘骨反应。
基于种植体放置后和此后每次随访的临床和影像学检查,评估了种植体周围硬组织的稳定性。临床数据通过患者水平的线性混合效应模型统计进行处理。
43 名无牙和部分无牙患者接受了总共 97 个具有骨传导表面的种植体治疗。在功能 2 年后,根据预设标准,所有种植体和牙修复体均达到 100%的成功率。以植入为基线,功能 2 年后边缘骨水平的平均变化(ΔMBLp)为-0.36mm(SD:0.55),有 7 个种植体观察到骨吸收大于 1mm 且小于 2.5mm。以牙修复体放置为基线,负荷 2 年后的 ΔMBLp 为-0.13mm(SD:0.39),仅观察到两个种植体有大于 1mm 且小于 2.0mm 的骨吸收。龈生物型(P=0.006)和植入体淹没(P<.05)的平均边缘骨损失存在统计学显著差异。分析了它们对生物学宽度恢复过程中种植体周围骨丢失动力学的影响。
本研究表明,具有中度粗糙颈部的种植体系统具有较高的种植体周围硬组织稳定性和 100%的成功率。龈生物型和种植体淹没被评估为对边缘骨损失有显著影响的因素。