• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回顾性评估非潜入式和亚基底部位置降低基台直径种植体周围的牙槽骨变化:种植体植入时植骨的效果。

Retrospective evaluation of crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: the effect of bone grafting at implant placement.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2011 Feb;82(2):234-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100340. Epub 2010 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1902/jop.2010.100340
PMID:20731584
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited information regarding the effect of grafting of the osteotomy after subcrestal implant placement. The primary aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the effect of bone grafting of the defect between the bone crest and the coronal aspect of implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions.

METHODS

Records of 50 consecutive patients treated with subcrestally placed dental implants grafted with a xenograft (Group A) and 50 consecutive patients with subcrestally placed dental implants without any grafting material (Group B) were reviewed. For each implant, the radiographs after placement were compared to images from the last follow-up visit and evaluated regarding the following: 1) degree of subcrestal positioning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard-tissue height over time, and 3) whether marginal hard-tissue could be detected on the implant platform at the follow-up visit.

RESULTS

The mean marginal loss of hard tissues was 0.11 ± 0.30 mm for Group A and 0.08 ± 0.22 mm for Group B. Sixty-nine percent of the implants in Group A and 77% of the implants in Group B demonstrated hard tissue on the implant platform. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding marginal peri-implant hard-tissue loss.

CONCLUSION

The present study fails to demonstrate that grafting of the remaining osseous wound defect between the bone crest and the coronal aspect of the implant has a positive effect on marginal peri-implant hard-tissue changes.

摘要

背景

关于在骨切开术后进行移植对种植体的影响,相关信息有限。本研究的主要目的是回顾性评估在非潜入式和骨下位置放置减小的基台的种植体骨嵴和冠方之间的骨缺损部位进行骨移植的效果。

方法

回顾性分析了 50 例接受骨下放置的牙种植体并用异种移植物(A 组)和 50 例接受骨下放置的牙种植体且无任何移植物材料(B 组)治疗的连续患者的记录。对于每个种植体,将植入后的放射线照片与最后一次随访时的图像进行比较,并评估以下方面:1)种植体的骨下定位程度,2)边缘硬组织高度随时间的变化,以及 3)在随访时是否可以在种植体平台上检测到边缘硬组织。

结果

A 组的平均边缘硬组织损失为 0.11 ± 0.30mm,B 组的平均边缘硬组织损失为 0.08 ± 0.22mm。A 组 69%的种植体和 B 组 77%的种植体在种植体平台上显示有硬组织。两组之间在边缘种植体周围硬组织损失方面没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

本研究未能表明在种植体骨嵴和冠方之间的剩余骨伤口缺损处进行移植对边缘种植体周围硬组织变化有积极影响。

相似文献

1
Retrospective evaluation of crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: the effect of bone grafting at implant placement.回顾性评估非潜入式和亚基底部位置降低基台直径种植体周围的牙槽骨变化:种植体植入时植骨的效果。
J Periodontol. 2011 Feb;82(2):234-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100340. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
2
Crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: a 1-year radiographic evaluation.种植体颈部骨吸收的 1 年放射学评价:直径减小的修复基台非潜入式和骨下放置对种植体周围骨变化的影响。
J Periodontol. 2010 Mar;81(3):428-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090317.
3
One abutment at one time: non-removal of an immediate abutment and its effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants.一次一个基台:不拆除即刻基台及其对骨下皮质锥形种植体周围骨愈合的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Nov;22(11):1303-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02111.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
4
Soft tissue and crestal bone changes around implants with platform-switched abutments placed nonsubmerged at subcrestal position: a 2-year clinical and radiographic evaluation.在非潜入式种植体平台转换基台位于牙槽嵴顶下方位置时,种植体周围软组织和牙槽嵴骨的变化:一项为期2年的临床和影像学评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1369-77. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4017. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
5
The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial.软组织厚度对种植体周围嵴顶骨变化的影响:一项为期1年的前瞻性对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):712-9.
6
Crestal bone-level changes around implants placed in post-extraction sockets augmented with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: a retrospective radiographic study.种植体周围牙槽嵴顶水平变化:应用脱矿冻干骨同种异体移植物增强拔牙窝后即刻植入的回顾性放射学研究。
J Periodontol. 2010 Oct;81(10):1441-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100175.
7
Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.微间隙大小对非潜入式牙种植体嵴顶骨水平的影响:犬下颌骨的影像学研究
J Periodontol. 2002 Oct;73(10):1111-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1111.
8
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.一项评估和比较在增强型和非增强型拔牙窝中植入物的随机临床试验:3 年结果。
J Periodontol. 2012 Jul;83(7):836-46. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110205. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
9
Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.上颌窦提升同期或延期植入牙种植体时,自体骨或牛骨材料对种植体周围的牙槽嵴顶和边缘骨的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 May;22(5):485-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02030.x. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
10
Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.用于在上颌和下颌萎缩无牙颌中植入种植体的替代性骨扩张技术。
J Oral Implantol. 2011 Aug;37(4):463-71. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00028. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical-Biological Assessment of Prosthetic Field Following Pre-Prosthetic Phase Related to Prosthetic Treatment Solutions.与修复治疗方案相关的修复前阶段后修复区域的临床生物学评估。
Clin Pract. 2025 Jul 26;15(8):140. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15080140.
2
Multicentre Prospective Study Analysing Relevant Factors Related to Marginal Bone Loss: A Two-Year Evolution.多中心前瞻性研究分析与边缘骨丢失相关的相关因素:两年进展情况
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(8):185. doi: 10.3390/dj11080185.
3
Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Xenogenic Block Grafts Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Grafts for Implant-retained Rehabilitation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
用于种植体支持修复的异种块状移植物与自体骨块状移植物水平牙槽嵴增高术的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2023 Jun 30;14(2):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2023.14201. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
4
Clinical and radiographic performance of self-locking conical connection implants in the posterior mandible: Five-year results of a two-centre prospective study.自锁定锥形连接种植体在下颌后区的临床和影像学表现:一项为期五年的双中心前瞻性研究结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Aug;32(8):998-1007. doi: 10.1111/clr.13794. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
An evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss according to implant type, surgical technique and prosthetic rehabilitation: a retrospective multicentre and cross-sectional cohort study.根据种植体类型、手术技术和修复体情况评估种植体周围边缘骨丧失:一项回顾性多中心和横断面队列研究。
Odontology. 2021 Jul;109(3):649-660. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00587-9. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
6
Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体颊侧骨水平位置对平台转换种植体周围软硬组织的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):555-570. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2301-1. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
7
Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in peri-implant bone: A prospective comparative study.种植体嵴顶和嵴下植入对种植体周围骨组织的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jan 1;21(1):e103-10. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20747.