Pringuey D
Professeur émerite de psychiatrie, département de pédagogie et de simulation médicale Faculté de médecine de Nice, 28 avenue Valombrose, 06107 Nice Cedex 1, France.
Encephale. 2018 Dec;44(6S):S51-S54. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7006(19)30081-8.
In his work « Phenomenology of Psychosis » Arthur Tatossian tends to report the basal alteration of patients to a constrained phenomenological reduction and deducts the drive of daily life as a sensitive point of the schizophrenic experience, vulnerability and mark of his destiny. This perspective reveals the challenge of the dynamics of human identity. Going beyond the spatial figure of a split, Alfred Kraus takes up the living format of the dynamics of « role », which regulates the relation of the subject to Self and others, and suggests to report symptoms and syndromes, another stake destined, to one of the variants dialectics of the balance between self and others. We return to the psychopathological intuition of the origins of psychiatric phenomenology to relate the disorder to a particular experience of the lived time, a modification of the relations between the temporal ecstasies that Bin Kimura describes as an excessive « futurisation » by accentuation of the possible and impatience to exist. These approaches inform in a novel way the system of care, and far from advocating objective therapeutic applications, generate implications that can enrich and enhance care projects.
在其著作《精神病现象学》中，亚瑟·塔托西安倾向于将患者的基础改变归因于一种受限的现象学还原，并将日常生活驱力作为精神分裂症体验、易感性及其命运标志的一个敏感点加以推导。这种观点揭示了人类身份动态的挑战。阿尔弗雷德·克劳斯超越了分裂的空间形象，采用了“角色”动态的生活形式，这种形式调节着主体与自我及他人的关系，并建议将症状和综合征（另一个既定的利害关系）与自我和他人之间平衡的辩证变体之一联系起来。我们回归到精神病理现象学起源的心理病理学直觉，将这种障碍与一种特定的生存时间体验联系起来，即本·木村所描述的通过强调可能性和对存在的不耐烦而导致的时间狂喜之间关系的一种过度“未来化”改变。这些方法以一种新颖的方式为护理体系提供信息，并且远非倡导客观的治疗应用，而是产生了能够丰富和提升护理方案的影响。
