Bochicchio Sara, Xhepa Alba, Secondi Roberta, Acquistapace Alessandra, Oldani Marta, Cigada Mario V, Giani Andrea, Staurenghi Giovanni
Eye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco," University of Milan, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Eye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco," University of Milan, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Jan;3(1):27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
To compare the difference in the rate of survival of unaffected fellow eyes between choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the first eyes and retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) in the first eyes.
Cohort retrospective study.
A total of 329 consecutive patients enrolled in our Eye Clinic between February 2006 and November 2014 were involved in the study. Only patients with naïve unilateral forms of neovascularization in 1 eye were included in this study.
A clinical database containing patients' data and ocular history was evaluated. Only patients with naive lesions in 1 eye and without signs of neovascular AMD in the fellow eye were included in the analysis. The time of absence of neovascularization in the fellow eye was calculated.
Survival of the fellow eye was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank test was used to compare CNV and RAP fellow eye survival.
A total of 202 eyes affected by CNV and 39 eyes affected by RAP were enrolled in the study. The mean follow-up time was 2.9 years (range, 182-2461 days) for CNV and 2.6 years (range, 519-1504 days) for RAP. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 50% of the fellow eyes with CNV did not develop neovascularization for 5.3 years, whereas the 50% of the fellow eyes with RAP did not develop neovascularization for 3.5 years. Log-rank test showed a highly significant difference between the 2 curves (P < 0.002).
This study showed that the incidence of neovascularization in the unaffected fellow eye increases with time, and when the first eye is affected by RAP, the development of a lesion in the second eye is more premature.
比较第一眼发生脉络膜新生血管(CNV)与第一眼发生视网膜血管瘤样增殖(RAP)时,未受影响的对侧眼的生存率差异。
队列回顾性研究。
2006年2月至2014年11月期间在我们眼科门诊连续登记的329例患者参与了本研究。本研究仅纳入单眼初发性新生血管病变的患者。
评估包含患者数据和眼部病史的临床数据库。分析仅纳入单眼有初发性病变且对侧眼无新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性体征的患者。计算对侧眼无新生血管形成的时间。
采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估对侧眼的生存率,采用对数秩检验比较CNV和RAP对侧眼的生存率。
本研究共纳入202只受CNV影响的眼和39只受RAP影响的眼。CNV组的平均随访时间为2.9年(范围182 - 2461天),RAP组为2.6年(范围519 - 1504天)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,50%的CNV对侧眼在5.3年内未发生新生血管形成,而50%的RAP对侧眼在3.5年内未发生新生血管形成。对数秩检验显示两条曲线之间存在高度显著差异(P < 0.002)。
本研究表明,未受影响的对侧眼新生血管形成的发生率随时间增加,且当第一眼受RAP影响时,第二眼病变的发生更为提前。