University of Washington.
Harvard University.
Transcult Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;57(4):567-580. doi: 10.1177/1363461519832473. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
Recent revisions of the () increasingly acknowledge the importance of cultural context for the diagnosis of mental illness. However, these same revisions include evolving diagnostic criteria that simultaneously decontextualize particular disorders such as Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). As a result, the reflects a contradictory role for context in psychiatric diagnosis. The case analysis presented here frames the consequences of this contradictory trend for an American Indian woman with a history of MDD and PTSD, whose diagnostic portrait is substantively altered in light of more recent criteria. Specifically, consideration of this respondent's bereavement-related illness experience suggests that a sociocentric cultural frame of reference, which places high value on interdependent personal relationships, is not well-captured by 's revised MDD or PTSD criteria, or the newly proposed categories of traumatic bereavement or Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder. The respondent's illness experience argues for greater recognition of this contradictory diagnostic trend, suggesting a need for future resolution of this tension toward more valid diagnosis for culturally diverse populations.
最近修订的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》越来越认识到文化背景对精神疾病诊断的重要性。然而,这些修订同样包括了不断发展的诊断标准,这些标准同时使特定障碍(如重度抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍)去语境化。因此,《手册》反映了文化在精神科诊断中的矛盾作用。这里提出的案例分析阐述了这种矛盾趋势对一位有重度抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍病史的美国印第安妇女的后果,根据最近的《手册》标准,她的诊断画像发生了实质性的改变。具体来说,考虑到这位受访者与丧亲有关的患病经历,表明一种以社会为中心的文化参照框架,高度重视相互依存的人际关系,不能很好地被《手册》修订后的重度抑郁症或创伤后应激障碍标准,或新提出的创伤性丧亲或持续性复杂丧亲障碍类别所捕捉。受访者的患病经历证明了需要更加认识到这种矛盾的诊断趋势,这表明需要解决这种紧张关系,以便为文化多样化的人群提供更有效的诊断。