School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, The School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Oct;48(10):1372-1379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
The aim of this study was to quantify the fluctuating dynamic facial asymmetry during smiling in a group of 'normal' adults, using three-dimensional (3D) motion facial capture technology. Fifty-four male and 54 female volunteers were recruited. Each subject was imaged using a passive markerless 3D motion capture system (DI4D). Eighteen landmarks were tracked through the 3D capture sequence. A facial asymmetry score was calculated based on either a clinically derived midline or Procrustes alignment; scores were based on the Euclidean distance between landmark pairs. Facial asymmetry scores were determined at three time points: rest, median, and maximum frame. Based on the clinically derived midline and on Procrustes alignment, the differences between male and female volunteers, as well as those at the three different time points, were not clinically significant. However, throughout a smile, facial and lip asymmetry scores increased over the duration of the smile. Fluctuating facial asymmetry exists within individuals, as well as between individuals. Procrustes superimposition and the clinically derived midline produced similar asymmetry scores and both are valid for symmetrical faces. However, with facial asymmetry, Procrustes superimposition may not be a valid measure, and the use of the clinically derived midline may be more appropriate, although this requires further investigation.
本研究旨在使用三维(3D)运动面部捕捉技术,量化一组“正常”成年人微笑时的动态面部不对称变化。招募了 54 名男性和 54 名女性志愿者。每位受试者均使用无源无标记 3D 运动捕捉系统(DI4D)进行成像。通过 3D 捕获序列跟踪 18 个标志点。根据临床得出的中线或 Procrustes 配准计算面部不对称评分;评分基于标志点对之间的欧几里得距离。在休息、中间和最大帧三个时间点确定面部不对称评分。基于临床得出的中线和 Procrustes 配准,男性和女性志愿者之间以及三个不同时间点之间的差异没有临床意义。然而,在微笑过程中,面部和嘴唇不对称评分随着微笑时间的延长而增加。个体内部和个体之间存在波动的面部不对称。Procrustes 叠加和临床得出的中线产生相似的不对称评分,两者都适用于对称的面部。然而,对于面部不对称,Procrustes 叠加可能不是有效的测量方法,使用临床得出的中线可能更合适,尽管这需要进一步研究。