Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar 5;2019:8747438. doi: 10.1155/2019/8747438. eCollection 2019.
Selection and prioritization of patients with HCC for LT are based on pretransplant imaging diagnostic, taking the risk of incorrect diagnosis. According to the German waitlist guidelines, imaging has to be reported to the allocation organization (Eurotransplant) and pathology reports have to be submitted thereafter. In order to assess current procedures we performed a retrospective multicenter analysis in all German transplant centers with focus on accuracy of imaging diagnostic and tumor classification. 1168 primary LT for HCC were conducted between 2007 and 2013 in Germany. Patients inside the Milan, UCSF, and up-to-seven criteria were misclassified with definitive histologic results in 18%, 15%, and 11%, respectively. Patients pretransplant outside the Milan, UCSF, and up-to-seven criteria were otherwise misclassified in 34%, 43%, and 41%. Recurrence-free survival correlated with classification by posttransplant histological report, but not pretransplant imaging diagnostic. Univariate analysis revealed tumor size, vascular invasion, and grading as significant parameters for outcome, while tumor grading was the only parameter persisting by multivariate testing. . There was a relevant percentage (15-40%) of patients misclassified by imaging diagnosis at a time prior to LI-RADS and guidelines to improve imaging of HCC. Outcome analysis showed a good correlation to histological, in contrast poor correlation to imaging diagnosis, suggesting an adjustment of the LT selection and prioritization criteria.
对 HCC 患者进行 LT 的选择和优先排序基于移植前影像学诊断,存在误诊风险。根据德国候补名单指南,影像学报告必须提交给分配组织(欧洲移植组织),然后再提交病理学报告。为了评估当前的程序,我们对德国所有移植中心进行了回顾性多中心分析,重点是影像学诊断的准确性和肿瘤分类。2007 年至 2013 年间,德国共进行了 1168 例原发性 HCC LT。米兰、UCSF 和 up-to-seven 标准内的患者分别有 18%、15%和 11%被明确的组织学结果错误分类。米兰、UCSF 和 up-to-seven 标准外的患者在移植前被错误分类的比例分别为 34%、43%和 41%。无复发生存率与移植后组织学报告的分类相关,但与移植前影像学诊断无关。单因素分析显示肿瘤大小、血管侵犯和分级是预后的重要参数,而肿瘤分级是多因素检验中唯一持续存在的参数。在 LI-RADS 和改善 HCC 影像学指南实施之前,存在一定比例(15-40%)的患者被影像学诊断错误分类。结果分析显示与组织学具有良好的相关性,而与影像学诊断相关性较差,提示需要调整 LT 的选择和优先排序标准。