Suppr超能文献

胎儿生长受限的产前识别与新生儿发病率和死产风险。

Prenatal identification of small-for-gestational age and risk of neonatal morbidity and stillbirth.

机构信息

AUDIPOG (Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers Informatisés en Pédiatrie, Obstétrique et Gynécologie), Faculty of Medicine RTH Laennec, Lyon, France.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Thiers, Thiers, France.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;55(5):621-628. doi: 10.1002/uog.20282. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether prenatal identification of small-for-gestational age (SGA) was associated with lower rates of the primary composite outcome of stillbirth, death in the delivery room or neonatal complications, and secondary outcomes of the composite outcome according to gestational age at delivery, stillbirth and low 5-min Apgar score.

METHODS

This historical cohort study included women who had a singleton delivery (≥ 32 weeks) between 1994 and 2011 at one of 247 French maternity units. We excluded pregnancies terminated medically, infants with malformations or with missing data on estimated fetal weight or birth weight, and women with missing delivery data. Among the 24 946 infants born SGA (< 5 percentile), we compared those who had been identified as such prenatally (n = 5093; 20%), with those who had not (n = 19 853; 80%). The main outcome was a composite variable defined as stillbirth or death in the delivery room, or transfer to a neonatal department either immediately or during the neonatal stay in the obstetrics ward. Secondary outcomes were the composite outcome according to gestational age at delivery (32 to < 35 weeks; 35 to < 37 weeks, 37 to < 40 weeks, or ≥ 40 weeks), stillbirth and low 5-min Apgar score (≤ 4 and < 7).

RESULTS

The mean ± SD birth weight was 2449.1 ± 368.3 g. The rate of the main composite outcome was higher in the group identified prenatally as SGA compared with non-identified SGA fetuses (39.5% vs 13.5%; adjusted relative risk (aRR), 1.29; 95% CI, 1.21-1.38). This association was not observed in the subgroups delivered before 37 weeks. The stillbirth rate was lower in fetuses with prenatal suspicion of SGA (aRR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.79), while the 5-min Apgar score did not differ between the two groups. The a-posteriori study power with α = 0.05 was 99%.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal identification of SGA was not associated with lower fetal or neonatal morbidity overall, although it was associated with a lower rate of stillbirth. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

评估产前小胎龄儿(SGA)的识别是否与较低的主要复合结局(死产、产房内死亡或新生儿并发症)发生率相关,以及根据分娩时的胎龄、死产和低 5 分钟 Apgar 评分,对次要复合结局的影响。

方法

本历史队列研究纳入了 1994 年至 2011 年间在法国 247 个产科单位中进行的单胎分娩(≥32 周)的妇女。我们排除了因医疗原因终止妊娠、存在畸形或缺少估计胎儿体重或出生体重数据的婴儿,以及缺少分娩数据的妇女。在 24946 名出生时为 SGA(<第 5 百分位)的婴儿中,我们比较了那些产前被识别为 SGA 的婴儿(n=5093;20%)与那些未被识别的婴儿(n=19853;80%)。主要结局是一个复合变量,定义为死产或产房内死亡,或立即或在产科病房的新生儿期内转至新生儿科。次要结局是根据分娩时的胎龄(32 至<35 周;35 至<37 周、37 至<40 周或≥40 周)、死产和低 5 分钟 Apgar 评分(≤4 分和<7 分)的复合结局。

结果

平均出生体重为 2449.1±368.3g。与未被识别的 SGA 胎儿相比,产前被识别为 SGA 的婴儿主要复合结局的发生率更高(39.5%比 13.5%;调整后的相对风险(aRR)为 1.29;95%可信区间[CI]为 1.21-1.38)。这种关联在<37 周分娩的亚组中并未观察到。产前怀疑 SGA 的胎儿的死产发生率较低(aRR,0.47;95%CI,0.27-0.79),而两组的 5 分钟 Apgar 评分无差异。在 α=0.05 时,后验研究的效力为 99%。

结论

产前识别 SGA 与整体胎儿或新生儿发病率的降低无关,尽管与较低的死产率相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验