Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, KidSIM-ASPIRE Research Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;20(4):e191-e198. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001871.
We aimed to describe the impact of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation coach on healthcare provider perception of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during simulated pediatric cardiac arrest.
Prospective, observational study.
We conducted secondary analysis of data collected from a multicenter, randomized trial of providers who participated in a simulated pediatric cardiac arrest.
Two-hundred pediatric acute care providers.
Participants were randomized to having a cardiopulmonary resuscitation coach versus no cardiopulmonary resuscitation coach. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation coaches provided feedback on cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance and helped to coordinate key tasks. All teams used cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback technology.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality was collected by the defibrillator, and perceived cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality was collected by surveying participants after the scenario. We calculated the difference between perceived and measured quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defined accurate perception as no more than 10% deviation from measured quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Teams with a cardiopulmonary resuscitation coach were more likely to accurately estimate chest compressions depth in comparison to teams without a cardiopulmonary resuscitation coach (odds ratio, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.61-5.46; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference detected in accurate perception of chest compressions rate between groups (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.77-2.32; p = 0.32). Among teams with a cardiopulmonary resuscitation coach, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation coach had the best chest compressions depth perception (80%) compared with the rest of the team (team leader 40%, airway 55%, cardiopulmonary resuscitation provider 30%) (p = 0.003). No differences were found in perception of chest compressions rate between roles (p = 0.86).
Healthcare providers improved their perception of cardiopulmonary resuscitation depth with a cardiopulmonary resuscitation coach present. The cardiopulmonary resuscitation coach had the best perception of chest compressions depth.
我们旨在描述心肺复苏教练对模拟儿科心搏骤停期间医疗保健提供者对心肺复苏质量的感知的影响。
前瞻性观察性研究。
我们对参加模拟儿科心搏骤停的多中心随机试验中收集的数据进行了二次分析。
200 名儿科急症护理提供者。
参与者被随机分配到有或没有心肺复苏教练。心肺复苏教练提供心肺复苏表现的反馈,并帮助协调关键任务。所有团队都使用心肺复苏反馈技术。
使用除颤器收集心肺复苏质量,通过在场景后调查参与者来收集感知的心肺复苏质量。我们计算了感知和测量的心肺复苏质量之间的差异,并将准确感知定义为与测量的心肺复苏质量相差不超过 10%。与没有心肺复苏教练的团队相比,有心肺复苏教练的团队更有可能准确估计胸外按压深度(比值比,2.97;95%置信区间,1.61-5.46;p < 0.001)。两组之间准确感知胸外按压率没有发现显著差异(比值比,1.33;95%置信区间,0.77-2.32;p = 0.32)。在有心肺复苏教练的团队中,心肺复苏教练对胸外按压深度的感知最好(80%),而团队的其他成员(团队领导 40%、气道 55%、心肺复苏提供者 30%)则较差(p = 0.003)。在角色之间,对胸外按压率的感知没有差异(p = 0.86)。
有心肺复苏教练在场时,医疗保健提供者提高了他们对心肺复苏深度的感知。心肺复苏教练对胸外按压深度的感知最好。