Suppr超能文献

缓冲区氮素截留的Meta分析

A Meta-Analysis on Nitrogen Retention by Buffer Zones.

作者信息

Valkama Elena, Usva Kirsi, Saarinen Merja, Uusi-Kämppä Jaana

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2019 Mar;48(2):270-279. doi: 10.2134/jeq2018.03.0120.

Abstract

Buffer zones, established between agricultural fields and water bodies, are widely used as a measure to reduce N in surface runoff and groundwater. However, the literature indicates inconsistent results on the N removal efficiency of buffer zones between studies. We performed a weighed meta-analysis on the buffer zone effects on NO-N and total N in surface runoff and groundwater by summarizing 46 studies published between 1980 and 2017. The overall effects of buffer zones were a 33 (-48 to -17%, = 25) and 70% (-78 to -62%, = 38) NO-N reduction in surface runoff and in groundwater, respectively, compared with controls with no buffer zone. In addition, buffer zones reduced the total N in surface runoff by 57% (-68 to -43%, = 16). The effects of buffer zones on N retention were consistent across continents and in different climates. Nitrogen retention increased with increasing initial N concentrations discharged from the source of pollution. According to a meta-regression, the N removal efficiency in surface runoff decreased in consort with increasing buffer zone age. Otherwise, the meta-analysis revealed no effects of buffer zone characteristics such as the width or species number (for grass buffer zones) on the N retention in surface runoff and groundwater. Unlike groundwater quality, which responded equally well regardless of the source of pollution, buffer zone type, or buffer zone age, surface water quality is more sensitive, and it might not be satisfactorily improved by tree buffer zones or aged buffer zones, or when the source of pollution originates from grass production fields.

摘要

在农田和水体之间设立的缓冲带,被广泛用作减少地表径流和地下水中氮素的一项措施。然而,文献表明不同研究之间关于缓冲带氮去除效率的结果并不一致。我们通过总结1980年至2017年间发表的46项研究,对缓冲带对地表径流和地下水中硝态氮和总氮的影响进行了加权荟萃分析。与没有缓冲带的对照相比,缓冲带的总体效果是地表径流和地下水中的硝态氮分别减少了33%(-48%至-17%,n = 25)和70%(-78%至-62%,n = 38)。此外,缓冲带使地表径流中的总氮减少了57%(-68%至-43%,n = 16)。缓冲带对氮截留的影响在各大洲和不同气候条件下是一致的。氮截留量随着从污染源排放的初始氮浓度的增加而增加。根据荟萃回归分析,地表径流中的氮去除效率随着缓冲带年龄的增加而降低。否则,荟萃分析表明缓冲带特征,如宽度或物种数量(对于草本缓冲带),对地表径流和地下水中的氮截留没有影响。与无论污染源、缓冲带类型或缓冲带年龄如何都有同样良好响应的地下水水质不同,地表水水质更敏感,并且当污染源来自草地生产田时,树木缓冲带或老化缓冲带可能无法令人满意地改善地表水水质。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验