• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性完全闭塞患者经皮介入治疗后的性别差异与预后:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Sex Difference and Outcome after Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Mannem Santhosh, Rattanawong Pattara, Riangwiwat Tanawan, Vutthikraivit Wasawat, Putthapiban Prapaipan, Sukhumthammarat Weera, Kanitsoraphan Chanavuth, Chongsathidkiet Pakawat

机构信息

The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.

University of Hawaii Internal Medicine Residency Program, Honolulu, HI, USA; Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jan;21(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2019.03.003
PMID:30952609
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that sex difference is an outcome predictor in chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients who are undergoing percutaneous intervention (PCI). However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature have not been done. We assessed the outcome of PCI in CTO between male and female.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to September 2017. Included studies were published cohort (prospective or retrospective) and case control studies of CTO patients who underwent PCI that compared successful procedure and major cardiac event (MACE), including cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, and stroke, between male and female. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in this meta-analysis involving 30,830 CTO subjects (8350 female and 22,480 male) who underwent PCI. Females were not significantly associated with reduced risk of MACE (pooled risk ratio = 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.12, p = 0.262, I = 47.0%) as well as successful rate of PCI (pooled risk ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.10, p = 0.161, I = 76.6%) in CTO patients who underwent PCI.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that sex is not an independent risk factor of MACE or successful procedure in CTO patients who underwent PCI.

摘要

背景

近期研究表明,性别差异是接受经皮介入治疗(PCI)的慢性完全闭塞(CTO)患者的预后预测因素。然而,尚未对相关文献进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们评估了CTO患者PCI治疗中男性和女性的预后。

方法

我们全面检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库,检索时间从建库至2017年9月。纳入的研究为已发表的队列研究(前瞻性或回顾性)以及CTO患者接受PCI治疗的病例对照研究,这些研究比较了男性和女性患者PCI手术成功及主要心脏事件(MACE)情况,MACE包括心源性死亡、靶血管血运重建、心肌梗死和中风。采用DerSimonian和Laird的随机效应、通用逆方差法合并每项研究的数据,以计算风险比和95%置信区间。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了9项研究,共30830例接受PCI治疗的CTO患者(女性8350例,男性22480例)。女性患者发生MACE的风险降低与PCI成功率均无显著相关性(合并风险比=0.86,95%置信区间:0.66 - 1.12,p = 0.262,I² = 47.0%)以及PCI成功率(合并风险比=1.04,95%置信区间:0.99 - |1.10,p = 0.161,I² = 76.6%)。

结论

我们的研究表明,对于接受PCI治疗的CTO患者,性别并非MACE或手术成功的独立危险因素。

相似文献

1
Sex Difference and Outcome after Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.慢性完全闭塞患者经皮介入治疗后的性别差异与预后:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jan;21(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Long-term prognosis of chronic total occlusion treated by successful percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功治疗糖尿病或非糖尿病患者慢性完全闭塞的长期预后:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Jan 30;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01223-8.
3
Optimal medical therapy vs. coronary revascularization for patients presenting with chronic total occlusion: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score adjusted studies.慢性完全闭塞患者的最佳药物治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:随机对照试验和倾向评分调整研究的荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 1;93(6):E320-E325. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28037. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
4
Procedural and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架内慢性完全闭塞的操作及长期结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 8;10(9):892-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.047. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
Chronic total occlusion intervention of the non-infarct-related artery in acute myocardial infarction patients: the Korean multicenter chronic total occlusion registry.急性心肌梗死患者非梗死相关动脉慢性完全闭塞病变的介入治疗:韩国多中心慢性完全闭塞病变注册研究
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Sep;29(6):495-501. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000630.
6
Successful Recanalization of Native Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Is Not Associated With Improved Long-Term Survival.原位冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞再通与长期生存改善无关。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 28;9(6):530-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.016. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
7
Incidence, predictors and longer-term impact of troponin elevation following hybrid chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.杂交慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后肌钙蛋白升高的发生率、预测因素和长期影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):E308-E316. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27545. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
8
Long-term clinical outcomes of successful revascularization with drug-eluting stents for chronic total occlusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架成功再血管化治疗慢性完全闭塞病变的长期临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar;89(S1):574-581. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26934.
9
A Clinical and Angiographic Scoring System to Predict the Probability of Successful First-Attempt Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Total Chronic Coronary Occlusion.一种用于预测完全性慢性冠状动脉闭塞患者首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功率的临床和血管造影评分系统。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;8(12):1540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.009.
10
Correlates and outcomes related to periprocedural myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: Results from a prospective, single center PCI registry.慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期心肌损伤的相关因素及预后:一项前瞻性单中心PCI注册研究的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar;87 Suppl 1:616-23. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26406. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on Sex-Specific Considerations in Myocardial Revascularization.SCAI关于心肌血运重建中性别特异性考量的专家共识声明。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Feb 3;1(2):100016. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2021.100016. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
2
Analysis of Gender-Based Inequality in Cardiovascular Health: An Umbrella Review.心血管健康领域基于性别的不平等分析:一项综述
Cureus. 2023 Aug 14;15(8):e43482. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43482. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Predictors of Adverse Events Among Chronic Total Occlusion Patients Undergoing Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Medical Therapy.
成功行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和药物治疗的慢性完全闭塞病变患者不良事件的预测因素。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Oct 14;16:1847-1855. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S337069. eCollection 2021.
4
Sex-Based Differences in Coronary and Structural Percutaneous Interventions.冠状动脉和结构性经皮介入治疗中的性别差异。
Cardiol Ther. 2020 Dec;9(2):257-273. doi: 10.1007/s40119-020-00176-5. Epub 2020 May 21.