Suppr超能文献

伴有病理 N1 转移的甲状腺乳头状癌的最佳手术方式:来自 SEER 数据库的分析。

The optimal surgical approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma with pathological n1 metastases: An analysis from the SEER database.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.

Department of Scientific Research, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2020 Jan;130(1):269-273. doi: 10.1002/lary.27947. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The definition of large-volume pathologic N1 metastases has been changed in the 2017 version 2 of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, leading to a controversy over the optimal surgical approach selection for patients with biopsy-proven papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of total thyroidectomy (TT) and thyroid lobectomy (TL) for these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective population-based database analysis.

METHODS

A total of 906 consecutive PTC patients with pathologic N1 metastases (>5 involved nodes with metastases ≤5 mm in the largest dimension) were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, and divided into two groups (≤2 mm, >2-5 mm) based on the size of the extent of disease. Overall survival (OS) was then compared between patients treated with TT and TL, followed by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to explore multiple prognostic factors.

RESULTS

OS favored TT compared with TL in patients with more than five involved nodes and metastases >2 to 5 mm in the largest dimension (P < .05). Cox analysis showed that the TL was not an independent factor associated with poorer OS than TT in these patients (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

TT showed better survival than TL for patients with more than five involved nodes and metastases >2 to 5 mm in the largest dimension. For patients with more than five involved nodes and metastases ≤2 mm in the largest dimension, either TT or TL can be recommended because there was no difference in survival.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 130:269-273, 2020.

摘要

目的/假设:2017 年版第 2 版国家综合癌症网络指南改变了大体积病理性 N1 转移的定义,这导致了对于经活检证实的甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者最佳手术方法选择的争议。本研究旨在探讨全甲状腺切除术(TT)和甲状腺叶切除术(TL)对这些患者的治疗效果。

研究设计

回顾性基于人群的数据库分析。

方法

从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中检索了 906 例连续的 PTC 患者,这些患者均存在病理性 N1 转移(>5 个受累淋巴结,转移灶最大直径>5mm 且≤5mm),并根据疾病范围的大小将其分为两组(≤2mm,>2-5mm)。然后比较 TT 和 TL 治疗的患者的总生存率(OS),然后进行 Cox 比例风险回归分析以探讨多个预后因素。

结果

在有 5 个以上受累淋巴结且转移灶最大直径>2-5mm 的患者中,OS 有利于 TT 而不是 TL(P<.05)。Cox 分析表明,在这些患者中,TL 不是与 TT 相比 OS 较差的独立因素(P>.05)。

结论

对于有 5 个以上受累淋巴结且转移灶最大直径>2-5mm 的患者,TT 比 TL 的生存率更好。对于有 5 个以上受累淋巴结且转移灶最大直径≤2mm 的患者,无论是 TT 还是 TL 都可以推荐,因为生存率没有差异。

证据水平

NA 喉科学,130:269-273,2020 年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验