Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, León, Spain.
Research, Health and Podiatry Unit. Department of Health Sciences. Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry. Universidade da Coruña, Spain; Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
Phys Ther Sport. 2019 May;37:128-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
The aim of this study was to compare diaphragm thickness and excursion between athletes with and without lumbopelvic pain (LPP) by trans-costal and trans-hepatic rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI), respectively.
A case-control study.
Amateur and semiprofessional athletes teams.
Forty matched-paired athletes with LPP (n = 20; LPP case group) and without LPP (n = 20; Healthy control group) were recruited.
Diaphragm thickness and excursion (cm) were assessed during relaxed respiratory activity (maximum inspiration-T, expiration-T and difference-T) by trans-costal and trans-hepatic rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI), respectively.
Statistically significant differences (P < .05) with an effect size from moderate to large (d = 0.63-1.07) were shown for bilateral diaphragm thickness reductions at T and thickness difference at T-T of the right hemi-diaphragm for athletes with LPP compared to healthy athletes.
Athletes who suffered from LPP presented a reduced diaphragm thickness compared to healthy matched-paired athletes. Therefore, these novel findings may suggest that diaphragm reeducation could be a main focus of intervention related to athletic performance, prevention and rehabilitation. Nevertheless, these findings should be considered with caution due to the possible influence of the RUSI measurement errors of the diaphragm activation during normal breathing.
本研究旨在通过经肋缘和经肝超声康复成像(RUSI)分别比较有和无腰骨盆疼痛(LPP)的运动员的膈肌厚度和移动度。
病例对照研究。
业余和半职业运动员队。
招募了 40 名配对的有 LPP(n=20;LPP 病例组)和无 LPP(n=20;健康对照组)的运动员。
在放松呼吸活动期间(最大吸气-T、呼气-T 和差异-T),分别通过经肋缘和经肝超声康复成像(RUSI)评估膈肌厚度和移动度(cm)。
与健康运动员相比,患有 LPP 的运动员在 T 时双侧膈肌厚度减小,右半膈肌 T-T 时厚度差异具有统计学意义(P<.05),效应量从中度到较大(d=0.63-1.07)。
患有 LPP 的运动员的膈肌厚度较健康配对运动员减小。因此,这些新发现可能表明,膈肌再教育可能是与运动表现、预防和康复相关的干预的主要焦点。然而,由于 RUSI 在正常呼吸期间测量膈肌激活的可能存在误差,这些发现应谨慎考虑。