Suppr超能文献

不稳定严重指数评分值低于 7 并不预测关节镜下 Bankart 修复后的复发。

Instability severity index score values below 7 do not predict recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

机构信息

Unidad de Hombro y Codo, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Cta Colmenar Km 9, 100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.

Unidad de Miembro Superior, Hospital Maz, Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3905-3911. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05471-w. Epub 2019 Apr 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of the Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) in predicting an increased recurrence risk after an arthroscopic Bankart repair.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a cohort of patients operated in three different centres. The inclusion criteria (recurrent anterior instability [dislocation or subluxation] with or without hyperlaxity, arthroscopic Bankart repair) and the exclusion criteria (concomitant rotator cuff lesion, acute first-time dislocation, surgery after a previous anterior stabilization, surgery for an unstable shoulder without true dislocation or subluxation; multidirectional instability) were those used in the study that defined the ISIS score. The medical records and a telephone interview were used to identify the six variables that define the ISIS and identify recurrences.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-three shoulders met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 140 subjects (22 females/118 males; mean age 35.5 ± 7.9) with 142 (89.0%) shoulders were available for follow-up after 5.3 (1.1) (range 3.1-7.4) years. There were 20 recurrences (14.1%). The mean (SD) preoperative ISIS was 1.8 (1.6) in the patients without recurrence and 1.8 (1.9) in the patients with recurrence (n.s.). In the 117 subjects with ISIS between 0 and 3 the recurrence rate was 12.8%; in the 25 with ISIS 4 to 6 the rate was 20% (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

For subjects with anterior shoulder instability in which an arthroscopic Bankart repair is being considered, the use of the ISIS, when the values obtained are ≤ 6 was not useful to predict an increased recurrence risk in the midterm in this retrospectively evaluated case series. The efficacy of the ISIS score in defining a group of subjects with a preoperative increased risk of recurrence after an arthroscopic Bankart instability repair is limited in lower risk populations (with ISIS scores ≤ 6).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

摘要

目的

评估不稳定严重程度指数评分(ISIS)在预测关节镜 Bankart 修复术后复发风险增加方面的疗效。

方法

对在三个不同中心接受手术的患者队列进行回顾性研究。纳入标准(复发性前向不稳定[脱位或半脱位]伴或不伴过度松弛,关节镜 Bankart 修复)和排除标准(伴发肩袖损伤、急性首次脱位、初次前稳定术后、不稳定肩手术但无真性脱位或半脱位、多向不稳定)与定义 ISIS 评分的研究相同。使用病历和电话访谈来确定定义 ISIS 的六个变量并识别复发。

结果

163 个肩符合纳入和排除标准。其中,140 名患者(22 名女性/118 名男性;平均年龄 35.5 ± 7.9 岁)中有 142 名(89.0%)在 5.3(1.1)(范围 3.1-7.4)年后可获得随访。有 20 例复发(14.1%)。无复发患者的术前 ISIS 平均值(标准差)为 1.8(1.6),复发患者为 1.8(1.9)(无统计学差异)。在 ISIS 为 0 至 3 的 117 名患者中,复发率为 12.8%;在 ISIS 为 4 至 6 的 25 名患者中,复发率为 20%(无统计学差异)。

结论

对于考虑行关节镜 Bankart 修复术的前肩不稳定患者,当获得的 ISIS 值≤6 时,在回顾性评估的病例系列中,无法预测中期复发风险增加。在较低风险人群(ISIS 评分≤6)中,ISIS 评分在定义关节镜 Bankart 不稳定修复术后术前复发风险增加的患者群体方面的有效性有限。

证据水平

回顾性病例系列,IV 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验