Unidad de Hombro y Codo, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Cta Colmenar Km 9, 100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Unidad de Miembro Superior, Hospital Maz, Zaragoza, Spain.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3905-3911. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05471-w. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
To evaluate the efficacy of the Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) in predicting an increased recurrence risk after an arthroscopic Bankart repair.
Retrospective review of a cohort of patients operated in three different centres. The inclusion criteria (recurrent anterior instability [dislocation or subluxation] with or without hyperlaxity, arthroscopic Bankart repair) and the exclusion criteria (concomitant rotator cuff lesion, acute first-time dislocation, surgery after a previous anterior stabilization, surgery for an unstable shoulder without true dislocation or subluxation; multidirectional instability) were those used in the study that defined the ISIS score. The medical records and a telephone interview were used to identify the six variables that define the ISIS and identify recurrences.
One hundred and sixty-three shoulders met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 140 subjects (22 females/118 males; mean age 35.5 ± 7.9) with 142 (89.0%) shoulders were available for follow-up after 5.3 (1.1) (range 3.1-7.4) years. There were 20 recurrences (14.1%). The mean (SD) preoperative ISIS was 1.8 (1.6) in the patients without recurrence and 1.8 (1.9) in the patients with recurrence (n.s.). In the 117 subjects with ISIS between 0 and 3 the recurrence rate was 12.8%; in the 25 with ISIS 4 to 6 the rate was 20% (n.s.).
For subjects with anterior shoulder instability in which an arthroscopic Bankart repair is being considered, the use of the ISIS, when the values obtained are ≤ 6 was not useful to predict an increased recurrence risk in the midterm in this retrospectively evaluated case series. The efficacy of the ISIS score in defining a group of subjects with a preoperative increased risk of recurrence after an arthroscopic Bankart instability repair is limited in lower risk populations (with ISIS scores ≤ 6).
Retrospective case series, Level IV.
评估不稳定严重程度指数评分(ISIS)在预测关节镜 Bankart 修复术后复发风险增加方面的疗效。
对在三个不同中心接受手术的患者队列进行回顾性研究。纳入标准(复发性前向不稳定[脱位或半脱位]伴或不伴过度松弛,关节镜 Bankart 修复)和排除标准(伴发肩袖损伤、急性首次脱位、初次前稳定术后、不稳定肩手术但无真性脱位或半脱位、多向不稳定)与定义 ISIS 评分的研究相同。使用病历和电话访谈来确定定义 ISIS 的六个变量并识别复发。
163 个肩符合纳入和排除标准。其中,140 名患者(22 名女性/118 名男性;平均年龄 35.5 ± 7.9 岁)中有 142 名(89.0%)在 5.3(1.1)(范围 3.1-7.4)年后可获得随访。有 20 例复发(14.1%)。无复发患者的术前 ISIS 平均值(标准差)为 1.8(1.6),复发患者为 1.8(1.9)(无统计学差异)。在 ISIS 为 0 至 3 的 117 名患者中,复发率为 12.8%;在 ISIS 为 4 至 6 的 25 名患者中,复发率为 20%(无统计学差异)。
对于考虑行关节镜 Bankart 修复术的前肩不稳定患者,当获得的 ISIS 值≤6 时,在回顾性评估的病例系列中,无法预测中期复发风险增加。在较低风险人群(ISIS 评分≤6)中,ISIS 评分在定义关节镜 Bankart 不稳定修复术后术前复发风险增加的患者群体方面的有效性有限。
回顾性病例系列,IV 级。