Yoon Kyoung Ho, Kim Jung Suk, Kim Sang Jun, Park Moonsu, Park Soo Yeon, Park Sang Eon
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
2 Department of Physical Education, Graduate School of Education, Yongin University, Yongin, Korea.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 May-Aug;27(2):2309499019840827. doi: 10.1177/2309499019840827.
To compare the long term outcomes of transtibial nonanatomic single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Between January 2008 and September 2010, we retrospectively evaluated 377 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction and who were available at 8 years of follow-up. Patients who received transtibial nonanatomic SB ACL reconstruction ( n = 263) were assigned to group SB and DB ACL reconstruction ( n = 114) to group DB. The patients were assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Lysholm scores, Tegner activity score, knee joint stability tests, and patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) findings using the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) classification. Contralateral ACL (CACL) injury was also evaluated.
Thirteen patients underwent revision ACL surgery during the follow-up. Ultimately, 256 patients in group SB and 108 patients in group DB were available at the 8-year follow-up. At final follow-up, the IKDC subjective score ( p = 0.04) and Lysholm score ( p = 0.02) showed significantly superior results in group DB compared to group SB. However, there was no significant difference of Tegner activity score ( p = 0.30), range of motion ( p = 0.81), and knee joint stability tests. There was significant progression of patellofemoral OA between preoperative and final follow-up in ipsilateral knee of both groups but not significant progression in contralateral knee. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups at the follow-up. There were 2.7% ipsilateral ACL graft failure in group SB, compared with 5.2% in group DB ( p = 0.12) and 6.4% CACL tear in group SB, compared with 5.2% in group DB ( p = 0.65). The mean survivorship of ACL graft was 9.47 ± 0.05 years (95% confidence interval (CI), 9.36-9.58) in group SB and 9.87 ± 0.16 years (95% CI, 9.54-10.20) in group DB, and there was no significant difference ( p = 0.25).
DB ACL reconstruction resulted in significantly better clinical IKDC subjective scores and Lysholm scores. However, most of the differences in clinical scores were small, and the clinical relevance of this difference is unknown. In addition, there was no significant difference in Tegner activity score, knee joint stability tests, patellofemoral OA, and survivor rate of the ACL graft and CACL after reconstruction after a minimum of 8-year follow-up. Level of Evidence: Cohort study; level of evidence, 3.
比较经胫骨非解剖单束(SB)和双束(DB)前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的长期疗效。
2008年1月至2010年9月期间,我们回顾性评估了377例行初次ACL重建且随访8年时仍可获得的患者。接受经胫骨非解剖SB ACL重建的患者(n = 263)被分配至SB组,DB ACL重建的患者(n = 114)被分配至DB组。使用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm评分、Tegner活动评分、膝关节稳定性测试以及采用Kellgren-Lawrence(K-L)分级评估髌股骨关节炎(OA)情况对患者进行评估。还对侧方ACL(CACL)损伤情况进行了评估。
随访期间有13例患者接受了ACL翻修手术。最终,SB组有256例患者、DB组有108例患者完成了8年随访。在末次随访时,IKDC主观评分(p = 0.04)和Lysholm评分(p = 0.02)显示DB组显著优于SB组。然而,Tegner活动评分(p = 0.30)、活动范围(p = 0.81)和膝关节稳定性测试结果无显著差异。两组同侧膝关节术前至末次随访期间髌股OA均有显著进展,而对侧膝关节无显著进展。然而,随访时两组之间无显著差异。SB组同侧ACL移植物失败率为2.7%,而DB组为5.2%(p = 0.12);SB组CACL撕裂率为6.4%,而DB组为5.2%(p = 0.65)。SB组ACL移植物的平均生存率为9.47±0.05年(95%置信区间(CI),9.36 - 9.58),DB组为9.87±0.16年(95%CI,9.54 - 10.20),且无显著差异(p = 0.25)。
DB ACL重建在临床IKDC主观评分和Lysholm评分方面结果显著更好。然而,大多数临床评分差异较小,且这种差异的临床相关性尚不清楚。此外,至少8年随访后,在Tegner活动评分、膝关节稳定性测试、髌股OA以及ACL移植物和CACL重建后的生存率方面两组无显著差异。证据水平:队列研究;证据水平,3。