Oortwijn Wija, Klein Philip
Partner, Ecorys Nederland B.V.; Assistant Professor, Radboud university medical centre, Department for Health Evidence.
Consultant, Ecorys Nederland B.V.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(2):82-84. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000187.
Health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly used around the globe to inform resource allocation decisions. Furthermore, the importance of using explicit and transparent criteria for coverage decision making in line with health system values has been acknowledged. However, the values of a health system are often not explicitly taken into account in the HTA process. This situation influences the allocation of scarce resources and could lead to a discord between the HTA outcome and the values of the health system. We describe how evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) can help to improve this situation. EDPs are integrating two theoretical frameworks; multi-criteria decision-analysis and accountability for reasonableness. Through the use of EDPs, HTA agencies can ensure that health system values are more explicitly and consistently taken into account in the HTA process, enhancing the legitimacy of coverage decisions.
卫生技术评估(HTA)在全球范围内越来越多地被用于为资源分配决策提供依据。此外,人们已经认识到,依据卫生系统价值观,使用明确且透明的标准进行覆盖范围决策的重要性。然而,在卫生技术评估过程中,卫生系统的价值观往往没有得到明确考虑。这种情况影响了稀缺资源的分配,并可能导致卫生技术评估结果与卫生系统价值观之间出现不一致。我们描述了循证审议过程(EDP)如何有助于改善这种情况。循证审议过程整合了两个理论框架:多标准决策分析和合理性问责制。通过使用循证审议过程,卫生技术评估机构可以确保在卫生技术评估过程中更明确、更一致地考虑卫生系统价值观,从而增强覆盖范围决策的合法性。