Gordon Rowena, Ivens Sally, Ammerman Loren K, Fenton M Brock, Littlefair Joanne E, Ratcliffe John M, Clare Elizabeth L
School of Biological and Chemical Sciences Queen Mary University of London London UK.
Department of Biology Angelo State University San Angelo Texas USA.
Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb 23;9(6):3117-3129. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4896. eCollection 2019 Mar.
Interspecific differences in traits can alter the relative niche use of species within the same environment. Bats provide an excellent model to study niche use because they use a wide variety of behavioral, acoustic, and morphological traits that may lead to multi-species, functional groups. Predatory bats have been classified by their foraging location (edge, clutter, open space), ability to use aerial hawking or substrate gleaning and echolocation call design and flexibility, all of which may dictate their prey use. For example, high frequency, broadband calls do not travel far but offer high object resolution while high intensity, low frequency calls travel further but provide lower resolution. Because these behaviors can be flexible, four behavioral categories have been proposed: (a) gleaning, (b) behaviorally flexible (gleaning and hawking), (c) clutter-tolerant hawking, and (d) open space hawking. Many recent studies of diet in bats use molecular tools to identify prey but mainly focus on one or two species in isolation; few studies provide evidence for substantial differences in prey use despite the many behavioral, acoustic, and morphological differences. Here, we analyze the diet of 17 sympatric species in the Chihuahuan desert and test the hypothesis that peak echolocation frequency and behavioral categories are linked to differences in diet. We find no significant correlation between dietary richness and echolocation peak frequency though it spanned close to 100 kHz across species. Our data, however, suggest that bats which use both gleaning and hawking strategies have the broadest diets and are most differentiated from clutter-tolerant aerial hawking species.
物种间的性状差异会改变同一环境中物种的相对生态位利用情况。蝙蝠是研究生态位利用的绝佳模型,因为它们运用多种行为、声学和形态学性状,这可能导致形成多物种功能群。食虫蝙蝠已根据其觅食地点(边缘、杂乱区域、开阔空间)、采用空中捕食或地面觅食的能力以及回声定位叫声的设计和灵活性进行了分类,所有这些因素都可能决定它们对猎物的利用。例如,高频宽带叫声传播不远,但能提供高目标分辨率,而高强度低频叫声传播更远,但分辨率较低。由于这些行为可能具有灵活性,因此提出了四种行为类别:(a)地面觅食,(b)行为灵活型(地面觅食和空中捕食),(c)耐杂乱区域空中捕食,以及(d)开阔空间空中捕食。最近许多关于蝙蝠饮食的研究使用分子工具来识别猎物,但主要孤立地关注一两个物种;尽管存在许多行为、声学和形态学差异,但很少有研究能提供猎物利用存在显著差异的证据。在这里,我们分析了奇瓦瓦沙漠中17种同域分布物种的饮食,并检验了回声定位峰值频率和行为类别与饮食差异相关的假设。我们发现,尽管物种间回声定位峰值频率跨度接近100千赫,但饮食丰富度与回声定位峰值频率之间没有显著相关性。然而,我们的数据表明,采用地面觅食和空中捕食两种策略的蝙蝠饮食最为广泛,且与耐杂乱区域空中捕食物种差异最大。