Suppr超能文献

关于择偶决策的架构:偏好函数和择偶挑剔是截然不同的特征。

On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.

机构信息

Behavioral and Molecular Ecology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee , 3209 N Maryland Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53211 , USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 27;286(1897):20182830. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2830.

Abstract

Mate choice is an important cause of sexual selection; it can drive the evolution of extravagant ornaments and displays, and promote speciation through the reproductive isolation generated by rapid divergence of sexual traits. Understanding mate choice requires knowledge of the traits involved in generating mate-choice decisions, and how those traits may interact with each other. It has been proposed that mate-choice decisions are the outcome of two components that vary independently: the preference function (the ranking of the attractiveness of prospective mates) and choosiness (the effort invested in mate assessment). Here we test this hypothesis by examining individual variation in female preference functions and choosiness in green treefrogs ( Hyla cinerea). We show that measures describing preference functions and choosiness are not correlated. We also show that both components are influenced differently by variation in female body size, and that preference function shape (closed and preferring intermediate values or open-ended and preferring extremes) has a strong influence on this relationship: function traits are positively correlated with body size only for individuals with closed functions, while choosiness is positively correlated with body size for individuals with open functions, but negatively for those with closed functions.

摘要

交配选择是性选择的一个重要原因;它可以通过快速分化的性特征产生的生殖隔离来驱动奢侈的装饰物和展示品的进化,并促进物种形成。了解交配选择需要了解参与产生交配选择决策的特征,以及这些特征如何相互作用。有人提出,交配选择决策是两个独立变化的成分的结果:偏好函数(对潜在配偶吸引力的排名)和择偶挑剔性(在配偶评估上投入的努力)。在这里,我们通过检查绿树蛙(Hyla cinerea)中雌性偏好函数和择偶挑剔性的个体变异来检验这一假设。我们表明,描述偏好函数和择偶挑剔性的度量值不相关。我们还表明,这两个组成部分都受到雌性体型变化的不同影响,并且偏好函数形状(闭合的和偏好中间值或开放式的和偏好极端值)对这种关系有强烈的影响:对于具有闭合函数的个体,函数特征与体型呈正相关,而对于具有开放式函数的个体,择偶挑剔性与体型呈正相关,但对于具有闭合函数的个体,则呈负相关。

相似文献

1
On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 27;286(1897):20182830. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2830.
2
Mate Preferences and Choosiness Are Distinct Components of Mate Choice in Eastern Gray Treefrogs ().
Am Nat. 2022 Oct;200(4):506-517. doi: 10.1086/720730. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
3
Larger females are choosier in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
Behav Processes. 2017 Feb;135:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
5
Evolution of choosiness dictates whether search costs of mate choice enhance speciation by sexual selection.
J Evol Biol. 2022 Aug;35(8):1045-1059. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14036. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1997 May;72(2):283-327. doi: 10.1017/s0006323196005014.
8
How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection.
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 30;281(1785):20140190. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0190. Print 2014 Jun 22.
10
The evolution of age-specific choosiness and reproductive isolation in a model with overlapping generations.
Evolution. 2022 Feb;76(2):225-235. doi: 10.1111/evo.14417. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

2
C. elegans males optimize mate-preference decisions via sex-specific responses to multimodal sensory cues.
Curr Biol. 2024 Mar 25;34(6):1309-1323.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.02.036. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
Biol Lett. 2022 Nov;18(11):20220310. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0310. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice.
Front Neural Circuits. 2022 Sep 20;16:943888. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2022.943888. eCollection 2022.
5
Estimation of the strength of mate preference from mated pairs observed in the wild.
Evolution. 2022 Jan;76(1):29-41. doi: 10.1111/evo.14397. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
7
Does the choosiness of female crickets change as they age?
J Exp Biol. 2021 Jun 1;224(11). doi: 10.1242/jeb.241802. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
8
Extreme Duty Cycles in the Acoustic Signals of Tiger Moths: Sexual and Natural Selection Operating in Parallel.
Integr Org Biol. 2021 Jan 5;2(1):obaa046. doi: 10.1093/iob/obaa046. eCollection 2020.
9
The relationship between a combinatorial processing rule and a continuous mate preference function in an insect.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 30;287(1935):20201278. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1278. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
10
Structural manipulations of a shelter resource reveal underlying preference functions in a shell-dwelling cichlid fish.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 May 27;287(1927):20200127. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0127. Epub 2020 May 20.

本文引用的文献

2
Describing mate preference functions and other function-valued traits.
J Evol Biol. 2017 Sep;30(9):1658-1673. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13122. Epub 2017 Jun 25.
3
Larger females are choosier in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
Behav Processes. 2017 Feb;135:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
4
Cognitive Phenotypes and the Evolution of Animal Decisions.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Nov;31(11):850-859. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
5
Modality interactions alter the shape of acoustic mate preference functions in gray treefrogs.
Evolution. 2015 Sep;69(9):2384-98. doi: 10.1111/evo.12750. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
6
Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches.
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015 Jan;201(1):171-82. doi: 10.1007/s00359-014-0963-6. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
7
Condition dependence of female choosiness in a field cricket.
J Evol Biol. 2014 Nov;27(11):2529-40. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12509. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
8
Darwin's forgotten idea: the social essence of sexual selection.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Oct;46 Pt 4:501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
10
Mate sampling and choosiness in the sand goby.
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jun 26;280(1765):20130983. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0983. Print 2013 Aug 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验