Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2013 Aug;16(8):964-74. doi: 10.1111/ele.12142. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
The contribution of sexual selection to diversification remains poorly understood after decades of research. This may be in part because studies have focused predominantly on the strength of sexual selection, which offers an incomplete view of selection regimes. By contrast, students of natural selection focus on environmental differences that help compare selection regimes across populations. To ask how this disparity in focus may affect the conclusions of evolutionary research, we relate the amount of diversification in mating displays to quantitative descriptions of the strength and the amount of divergence in mate preferences across a diverse set of case studies of mate choice. We find that display diversification is better explained by preference divergence rather than preference strength; the effect of the latter is more subtle, and is best revealed as an interaction with the former. Our findings cast the action of sexual selection (and selection in general) in a novel light: the strength of selection influences the rate of evolution, and how divergent selection is determines how much diversification can occur. Adopting this view will enhance tests of the relative role of natural and sexual selection in processes such as speciation.
经过几十年的研究,性选择对生物多样性形成的贡献仍然知之甚少。这可能部分是因为研究主要集中在性选择的强度上,而这种方法提供的是选择机制的不完整视图。相比之下,自然选择的研究者关注的是有助于比较不同种群选择机制的环境差异。为了探究这种关注焦点的差异可能如何影响进化研究的结论,我们将交配展示的多样化程度与对配偶偏好的强度和分歧程度的定量描述联系起来,这些描述来自一系列不同的配偶选择案例研究。我们发现,展示的多样化程度可以更好地用偏好分歧来解释,而不是偏好强度;后者的影响更为微妙,只有当它与前者相互作用时才会显现出来。我们的研究结果为性选择(以及一般意义上的选择)的作用提供了一个新的视角:选择的强度影响进化的速度,而分歧选择的程度决定了多样化的程度。采用这种观点将增强对自然选择和性选择在物种形成等过程中相对作用的检验。