• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性粒单核细胞白血病患者接受低甲基化剂治疗的反应率不理想:单机构 121 例患者研究。

Suboptimal response rates to hypomethylating agent therapy in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; a single institutional study of 121 patients.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Am J Hematol. 2019 Jul;94(7):767-779. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25488. Epub 2019 May 3.

DOI:10.1002/ajh.25488
PMID:30964202
Abstract

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) are currently the only FDA approved therapy for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). In the current retrospective study, we assessed response rates as adjudicated by the IWG (International Working Group) MDS (myelodysplastic syndrome) and MDS/MPN myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndrome response criteria, in 121 CMML patients treated with Azacitidine (AZA, n = 56) and Decitabine (DAC, n = 65). The overall response rates were 41% by the IWG MDS (AZA- 45%, DAC-39%), and 56% by the IWG MDS/MPN (AZA-56%, DAC-58%) response criteria, with CR (complete remission) rates of <20% for both agents, by both criteria. There were no significant differences in response rates between proliferative and dysplastic CMML. Moreover, 29% of CMML patients in a CR with HMA progressed to AML (blast transformation), underscoring the limited impact of these agents on disease biology. Progression after HMA response was associated with a median overall-survival (OS) of 8 months, while median OS in patients with primary HMA failure was 4 months. Lower serum LDH levels (<250 Units/L) were associated with HMA responses by both criteria; while ASXL1 and TET2 mutational status had no impact. HMA treated patients had a longer median OS (31 vs 18 months; P = .01), in comparison to those treated with conventional care regimens (excluding observation only patients), without any differences between AZA vs DAC (P = .37). In conclusion, this study highlights the inadequacies of HMA therapy in CMML, retrospectively validates the IWG MDS/MPN response criteria and underscores the need for newer, rationally derived therapies.

摘要

低甲基化药物(HMA)是目前唯一获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗慢性粒单核细胞白血病(CMML)的药物。在这项回顾性研究中,我们根据国际工作组(IWG)的 MDS(骨髓增生异常综合征)和 MDS/MPN 重叠综合征缓解标准,评估了 121 例接受阿扎胞苷(AZA,n=56)和地西他滨(DAC,n=65)治疗的 CMML 患者的缓解率。根据 IWG MDS 标准,总缓解率为 41%(AZA-45%,DAC-39%),根据 IWG MDS/MPN 标准,总缓解率为 56%(AZA-56%,DAC-58%),两种药物的完全缓解(CR)率均<20%。增殖性和发育不良性 CMML 之间的缓解率无显著差异。此外,HMA 治疗后达到 CR 的 29%的 CMML 患者进展为 AML(白血病转化),这突出了这些药物对疾病生物学的影响有限。HMA 缓解后进展与中位总生存期(OS)为 8 个月相关,而原发性 HMA 失败患者的中位 OS 为 4 个月。根据两种标准,较低的血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平(<250U/L)与 HMA 反应相关;而 ASXL1 和 TET2 突变状态没有影响。与接受常规治疗方案(不包括仅观察患者)的患者相比,接受 HMA 治疗的患者中位 OS 更长(31 与 18 个月;P=.01),且 AZA 与 DAC 之间无差异(P=.37)。总之,这项研究突出了 HMA 治疗在 CMML 中的不足,回顾性验证了 IWG MDS/MPN 缓解标准,并强调了需要新的、合理衍生的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Suboptimal response rates to hypomethylating agent therapy in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; a single institutional study of 121 patients.慢性粒单核细胞白血病患者接受低甲基化剂治疗的反应率不理想:单机构 121 例患者研究。
Am J Hematol. 2019 Jul;94(7):767-779. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25488. Epub 2019 May 3.
2
Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndromes: a focused review.骨髓增生异常综合征/骨髓增殖性肿瘤重叠综合征:重点综述。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020 Dec 4;2020(1):460-464. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2020000163.
3
Prognostic Role of Gene Mutations in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Patients Treated With Hypomethylating Agents.基因突变在接受低甲基化剂治疗的慢性粒单核细胞白血病患者中的预后作用。
EBioMedicine. 2018 May;31:174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Outcome of patients with high risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and advanced Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) treated with decitabine after azacitidine failure.阿扎胞苷治疗失败后接受地西他滨治疗的高危骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)和晚期慢性粒单核细胞白血病(CMML)患者的结局
Leuk Res. 2015 May;39(5):501-4. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
5
Real Life Data on Efficacy and Safety of Azacitidine Therapy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.真实世界中阿扎胞苷治疗骨髓增生异常综合征、慢性粒单核细胞白血病和急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性数据。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jul;25(3):1175-1180. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-00574-0. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
6
Activity of decitabine, a hypomethylating agent, in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.地西他滨(一种去甲基化剂)在慢性粒单核细胞白血病中的活性。
Cancer. 2007 Feb 15;109(4):713-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22457.
7
Natural history of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents.使用去甲基化药物治疗的慢性粒单核细胞白血病的自然病史。
Am J Hematol. 2017 Jul;92(7):599-606. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24735. Epub 2017 May 26.
8
No benefit of hypomethylating agents compared to supportive care for higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome.与支持性治疗相比,低甲基化药物治疗高危骨髓增生异常综合征没有获益。
Korean J Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(6):1194-1202. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2016.426. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
Hypomethylating agent therapy use and survival in older patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in the United States: A large population-based study.美国老年慢性粒单核细胞白血病患者的低甲基化药物治疗与生存情况:一项基于大规模人群的研究
Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;123(19):3754-3762. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30814. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
10
Response to azacitidine in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia according to overlap myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms criteria.根据重叠型骨髓增生异常/骨髓增殖性肿瘤标准,慢性粒单核细胞白血病患者对阿扎胞苷的反应。
Leuk Res. 2022 May;116:106836. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106836. Epub 2022 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Tagraxofusp, a CD123-targeted therapy, for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: final results of a phase 1/2 study.塔格昔福司(一种靶向CD123的疗法)用于慢性粒单核细胞白血病:1/2期研究的最终结果。
Blood Neoplasia. 2025 May 11;2(4):100115. doi: 10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100115. eCollection 2025 Nov.
2
Novel small-molecule therapies for myelodysplastic syndromes with IPSS-R ⩾3.5 in patients aged 60 or older: current landscape and challenges.针对国际预后评分系统修订版(IPSS-R)≥3.5的60岁及以上骨髓增生异常综合征患者的新型小分子疗法:现状与挑战
Ther Adv Hematol. 2025 Sep 3;16:20406207251371298. doi: 10.1177/20406207251371298. eCollection 2025.
3
Efficacy and safety of oral decitabine/cedazuridine in the chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia subpopulations from phase 2 and 3 studies.
口服地西他滨/西扎珠利在2期和3期研究的慢性粒单核细胞白血病亚群中的疗效和安全性。
Br J Haematol. 2025 Aug;207(2):432-444. doi: 10.1111/bjh.20203. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
4
KDM6A Deficiency Induces Myeloid Bias and Promotes CMML-Like Disease Through JAK/STAT3 Activation by Repressing SOCS3.KDM6A缺陷通过抑制SOCS3激活JAK/STAT3诱导髓系偏向并促进类慢性粒单核细胞白血病疾病。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Jun;12(21):e2413091. doi: 10.1002/advs.202413091. Epub 2025 May 14.
5
The LILRB family in hematologic malignancies: prognostic associations, mechanistic considerations, and therapeutic implications.血液系统恶性肿瘤中的LILRB家族:预后关联、机制探讨及治疗意义
Biomark Res. 2024 Dec 19;12(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s40364-024-00705-7.
6
Prognostic Significance and Treatment Response Associations of Genetic Mutations in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.慢性粒单核细胞白血病基因突变的预后意义及治疗反应相关性:一项回顾性队列研究
Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 28;12(11):2476. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12112476.
7
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic innovations.慢性粒单核细胞白血病:分子发病机制与治疗创新
Haematologica. 2025 Jan 1;110(1):22-36. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2024.286061.
8
RAS mutations in myeloid malignancies: revisiting old questions with novel insights and therapeutic perspectives.髓系恶性肿瘤中的RAS突变:用新见解和治疗前景重新审视老问题。
Blood Cancer J. 2024 Apr 24;14(1):72. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01054-2.
9
The role of TET2 in solid tumors and its therapeutic potential: a comprehensive review.TET2 在实体瘤中的作用及其治疗潜力:全面综述。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Sep;26(9):2156-2165. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03478-5. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
10
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management.慢性粒单核细胞白血病:2024 年诊断、风险分层和治疗更新。
Am J Hematol. 2024 Jun;99(6):1142-1165. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27271. Epub 2024 Mar 7.