• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种电动牙刷对减轻牙龈炎症和龈上菌斑效果的比较

A Comparison of the Effect of Two Power Toothbrushes on the Reduction of Gingival Inflammation and Supragingival Plaque.

作者信息

Mirza Farah, Argosino Krista, Ward Marilyn, Ou San-San, Milleman Kimberly R, Milleman Jefferey L

机构信息

Philips Oral Healthcare, Bothell, WA, USA.

Salus Research, Fort Wayne, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 2019 Mar;30(Spec No A):A9-15.

PMID:30964969
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of the Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart and Oral-B Genius 8000 powered toothbrushes on gingivitis, gingival bleeding, and supragingival plaque reduction following 42 days of home use.

METHODS

This was a randomized, parallel, examiner-blinded, prospective clinical trial with two treatment groups. Eligible participants were generally healthy volunteers who were manual toothbrush users, non-flossers, 18-65 years of age. The subject panel included non-smokers with = 50 sites of gingival bleeding according to the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), and a supragingival plaque score of = 1.8 per Modified Plaque Index (MPI) at 3-6 hours following last tooth brushing encounter. Eligible subjects were randomized to use either a Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart with Premium Plaque Control brush head (DCS) or an Oral-B Genius 8000 with FlossAction brush head (OBG) for home use. Each toothbrush was used twice daily for two minutes. All subjects used a standardized fluoride-containing dentifrice. All other oral hygiene measures were prohibited. Subjects returned at Day 14 for an interim compliance and safety assessment, and at Day 42 for the final safety and efficacy assessments.

RESULTS

Of 222 enrolled and eligible subjects, 219 completed (112 in the SDC group, 107 in the OBG group) the study. The least squares (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) estimates for gingivitis reduction and percent reduction per Modified Gingival Index (MGI) following 42 days of product home use were 1.38 (1.30, 1.46) and 51.32% (48.45%, 54.19%) for DCS, and 0.53 (0.45, 0.61) and 20.07% (17.14%, 23.00%) for OBG. The differences, expressed as either reduction or percent reduction, were statistically significant between the two groups, p < 0.001. Statistically significant differences were also observed between products at Day 42 for the gingival bleeding and supragingival plaque reduction endpoints, p < 0.001. There were two reported adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart powered toothbrush reduced gingival inflammation, gingival bleeding, and supragingival plaque significantly more than the Oral-B Genius 8000 powered toothbrush following a 42-day home-use period. Both products were safe for use.

摘要

目的

比较在家使用42天后,飞利浦钻石亮白智能型声波震动牙刷和欧乐B智臻8000电动牙刷对牙龈炎、牙龈出血和龈上菌斑减少的效果。

方法

这是一项随机、平行、检查者盲法的前瞻性临床试验,分为两个治疗组。符合条件的参与者为一般健康的志愿者,他们是手动牙刷使用者,不使用牙线,年龄在18 - 65岁之间。受试者群体包括根据牙龈出血指数(GBI)有≥50个牙龈出血部位,且在最后一次刷牙后3 - 6小时,改良菌斑指数(MPI)≥1.8的非吸烟者。符合条件的受试者被随机分配在家使用飞利浦钻石亮白智能型声波震动牙刷搭配高级洁齿刷头(DCS)或欧乐B智臻8000搭配牙线引导型刷头(OBG)。每支牙刷每天使用两次,每次两分钟。所有受试者使用标准化含氟牙膏。禁止采取所有其他口腔卫生措施。受试者在第14天返回进行中期依从性和安全性评估,在第42天返回进行最终安全性和疗效评估。

结果

在222名登记并符合条件的受试者中,219名完成了研究(SDC组112名,OBG组107名)。在家使用产品42天后,DCS组牙龈炎减少的最小二乘(LS)均值及95%置信区间(CI)估计值和改良牙龈指数(MGI)的减少百分比分别为1.38(1.30,1.46)和51.32%(48.45%,54.19%),OBG组分别为0.53(0.45,0.61)和20.07%(17.14%,23.00%)。两组之间以减少量或减少百分比表示的差异具有统计学意义,p < 0.001。在第42天,产品在牙龈出血和龈上菌斑减少终点方面也观察到具有统计学意义的差异,p < 0.001。报告了两起不良事件。

结论

在家使用42天后,飞利浦钻石亮白智能型声波震动牙刷在减少牙龈炎症、牙龈出血和龈上菌斑方面比欧乐B智臻8000电动牙刷显著更有效。两种产品使用均安全。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of the Effect of Two Power Toothbrushes on the Reduction of Gingival Inflammation and Supragingival Plaque.两种电动牙刷对减轻牙龈炎症和龈上菌斑效果的比较
J Clin Dent. 2019 Mar;30(Spec No A):A9-15.
2
A Comparison of the Effect of Two Power Toothbrushes on the Gingival Health and Plaque Status of Subjects with Moderate Gingivitis.两种电动牙刷对中度牙龈炎患者牙龈健康和牙菌斑状况影响的比较
J Clin Dent. 2017 Mar;28(1 Spec No A):A29-35.
3
An Evaluation of Plaque and Gingivitis Reduction Following Home Use of Sonicare FlexCare Platinum with Premium Plaque Control Brush Head and a Manual Toothbrush.家用飞利浦声波震动牙刷FlexCare Platinum搭配专业防蛀刷头与手动牙刷后牙菌斑与牙龈炎减少情况的评估
J Clin Dent. 2017 Mar;28(1 Spec No A):A7-12.
4
The Effect of Use of a Sonic Power Toothbrush and a Manual Toothbrush Control on Plaque and Gingivitis.使用声波电动牙刷和手动牙刷对照对牙菌斑和牙龈炎的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2017 Mar;28(1 Spec No A):A1-6.
5
A Randomized Parallel Study to Compare the Effects of Powered and Manual Tooth Brushing on Gingival Health and Plaque.一项比较电动牙刷和手动牙刷对牙龈健康及牙菌斑影响的随机平行研究。
J Clin Dent. 2019 Mar;30(Spec No A):A16-23.
6
A six-week clinical evaluation of the plaque and gingivitis efficacy of an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush with a novel brush head utilizing angled CrissCross bristles versus a sonic toothbrush.一项为期六周的临床评估,比较一款采用新型刷头、带有成角度交叉刷毛的旋转振荡电动牙刷与一款声波牙刷在清除牙菌斑和治疗牙龈炎方面的功效。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(2):6-12.
7
A clinical study comparing the supragingival plaque and gingivitis efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to a commercially available manual flat-trim toothbrush.一项临床研究,比较一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与市售手动平切牙刷在龈上菌斑和牙龈炎治疗效果方面的差异。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A11-6.
8
A Comparison of the Effects of a Powered and Manual Toothbrush on Gingivitis and Plaque: A Randomized Parallel Clinical Trial.电动牙刷与手动牙刷对牙龈炎和牙菌斑影响的比较:一项随机平行临床试验
J Clin Dent. 2019 Mar;30(Spec No A):A24-29.
9
An 8-Week Clinical Comparison of an Oscillating-Rotating Electric Rechargeable Toothbrush and a Sonic Toothbrush in the Reduction of Gingivitis and Plaque.一款旋转振荡式电动充电牙刷与一款声波牙刷在减轻牙龈炎和牙菌斑方面的8周临床比较
J Clin Dent. 2018 Mar;29(1):27-32.
10
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Powered Toothbrushes: An Opportunity for Biofilm and Gingival Inflammation Control.电动牙刷:控制生物膜和牙龈炎症的一个契机。
Int J Dent. 2022 Aug 22;2022:6874144. doi: 10.1155/2022/6874144. eCollection 2022.
2
Effects of interactive power toothbrush with or without application assistance on the plaque, gingivitis, and gingival abrasion among dental students: a randomized controlled clinical trial.互动电动牙刷联合或不联合应用辅助对医学生菌斑、牙龈炎和牙龈磨损的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Sep;26(9):5931-5941. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04553-3. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
The efficacy of an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush compared to a high-frequency sonic power toothbrush on parameters of dental plaque and gingival inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
振荡旋转电动牙刷与高频超声电动牙刷对牙菌斑和牙龈炎症参数的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Feb;21(1):77-94. doi: 10.1111/idh.12597. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
4
Accidental Oral Injuries by Electric Toothbrush: A Report of Three Cases.电动牙刷导致的意外口腔损伤:三例报告
Case Rep Dent. 2020 Dec 15;2020:8819850. doi: 10.1155/2020/8819850. eCollection 2020.