1 Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University , Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601 , Australia.
2 Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyvaskyla , PO Box 35, Jyvaskyla 40014 , Finland.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Mar 18;374(1768):20180184. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0184.
In a rapidly changing environment, does sexual selection on males elevate a population's reproductive output? If so, does phenotypic plasticity enhance or diminish any such effect? We outline two routes by which sexual selection can influence the reproductive output of a population: a genetic correlation between male sexual competitiveness and female lifetime reproductive success; and direct effects of males on females' breeding success. We then discuss how phenotypic plasticity of sexually selected male traits and/or female responses (e.g. plasticity in mate choice), as the environment changes, might influence how sexual selection affects a population's reproductive output. Two key points emerge. First, condition-dependent expression of male sexual traits makes it likely that sexual selection increases female fitness if reproductively successful males disproportionately transfer genes that are under natural selection in both sexes, such as genes for foraging efficiency. Condition-dependence is a form of phenotypic plasticity if some of the variation in net resource acquisition and assimilation is attributable to the environment rather than solely genetic in origin. Second, the optimal allocation of resources into different condition-dependent traits depends on their marginal fitness gains. As male condition improves, this can therefore increase or, though rarely highlighted, actually decrease the expression of sexually selected traits. It is therefore crucial to understand how condition determines male allocation of resources to different sexually selected traits that vary in their immediate effects on female reproductive output (e.g. ornaments versus coercive behaviour). In addition, changes in the distribution of condition among males as the environment shifts could reduce phenotypic variance in certain male traits, thereby reducing the strength of sexual selection imposed by females. Studies of adaptive evolution under rapid environmental change should consider the possibility that phenotypic plasticity of sexually selected male traits, even if it elevates male fitness, could have a negative effect on female reproductive output, thereby increasing the risk of population extinction. This article is part of the theme issue 'The role of plasticity in phenotypic adaptation to rapid environmental change'.
在快速变化的环境中,雄性的性选择是否会提高种群的繁殖产量?如果是这样,表型可塑性会增强还是削弱这种影响?我们概述了性选择影响种群繁殖产量的两种途径:雄性性竞争力与雌性终生繁殖成功率之间的遗传相关性;以及雄性对雌性繁殖成功率的直接影响。然后,我们讨论了随着环境的变化,性选择雄性特征的表型可塑性和/或雌性反应(例如择偶的可塑性)如何影响性选择对种群繁殖产量的影响。有两个关键点。首先,如果成功繁殖的雄性不成比例地传递那些在两性中都受到自然选择的基因,例如觅食效率基因,那么具有条件依赖性的雄性性特征表达很可能会增加雌性的适合度。如果净资源获取和同化的部分变异归因于环境而不仅仅是遗传起源,那么条件依赖性就是表型可塑性的一种形式。其次,资源在不同条件依赖性状中的最优分配取决于它们的边际适合度收益。随着雄性条件的改善,这可以增加或实际上减少具有性选择特征的表达。因此,理解条件如何决定雄性将资源分配到不同的具有性选择特征的性状中,这些性状对雌性繁殖产量的直接影响各不相同(例如,装饰物与强制性行为),这一点至关重要。此外,随着环境的变化,雄性条件分布的变化可能会降低某些雄性特征的表型方差,从而降低雌性施加的性选择强度。在快速环境变化下的适应性进化研究中,应该考虑到性选择雄性特征的表型可塑性即使提高了雄性的适合度,也可能对雌性的繁殖产量产生负面影响,从而增加种群灭绝的风险。本文是主题为“快速环境变化下表型可塑性在表型适应中的作用”的一部分。