Suppr超能文献

解剖性肝切除术治疗早期肝细胞癌是否必要?单中心回顾性经验。

Is anatomical resection necessary for early hepatocellular carcinoma? A single institution retrospective experience.

机构信息

Department of Medical Statistics & Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.

Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, PR China.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2019 Jun;15(17):2041-2051. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0117. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine whether anatomical resection was necessary for early hepatocellular carcinoma. A log-rank test or two-stage test was used for univariate analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis. For patients without microvascular invasion, a resection margin ≥1 cm provided the longest recurrence-free survival time regardless of whether they underwent anatomical resection (p = 0.005) or nonanatomical resection (p = 0.006). For patients with microvascular invasion, anatomical resection combined with a resection margin ≥1 cm provided the longest recurrence-free survival time compared with other treatments (p = 0.001). Anatomical resection was not necessary for patients without microvascular invasion. However, for patients with microvascular invasion, both anatomical resection and a resection margin ≥1 cm were necessary.

摘要

本研究旨在确定解剖性肝切除术是否对早期肝细胞癌有必要。采用对数秩检验或两阶段检验进行单因素分析。采用 Cox 比例风险模型进行多因素分析。对于无微血管侵犯的患者,无论行解剖性肝切除术(p = 0.005)还是非解剖性肝切除术(p = 0.006),切缘≥1 cm 提供了最长的无复发生存时间。对于有微血管侵犯的患者,与其他治疗方法相比,解剖性肝切除联合切缘≥1 cm 提供了最长的无复发生存时间(p = 0.001)。对于无微血管侵犯的患者,解剖性肝切除术并非必要。然而,对于有微血管侵犯的患者,解剖性肝切除和切缘≥1 cm 均是必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验