1 Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jun;28(6):863-873. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7318. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
Family planning (FP) providers are in an optimal position to address harmful partner behaviors, yet face several barriers. We assessed the effectiveness of an interactive app to facilitate implementation of patient-provider discussions about intimate partner violence (IPV), reproductive coercion (RC), a wallet-sized educational card, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We randomized participants (English-speaking females, ages 16-29 years) from four FP clinics to two arms: Trauma-Informed Personalized Scripts (TIPS)-Plus and TIPS-Basic. We developed an app that prompted (1) tailored provider scripts (TIPS-Plus and TIPS-Basic) and (2) psychoeducational messages for patients (TIPS-Plus only). Patients completed pre- and postvisit surveys. We compared mean summary scores of IPV, RC, card, and STI discussions between TIPS-Plus and TIPS-Basic using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, explored predictors with ordinal regression, and compared implementation with historical data using chi-square. Of the 240 participants, 47.5% reported lifetime IPV, 12.5% recent IPV, and 7.1% recent RC. No statistically significant differences emerged from summary scores between arms for any outcomes. Several significant predictors were associated with higher scores for patient-provider discussions, including race, reason for visit, contraceptive method, and condom nonuse. Implementation of IPV, RC, and STI discussions increased significantly ( < 0.0001) when compared with historical clinical data for both TIPS-Basic and TIPS-Plus. We did not find an added benefit of patient activation messages in increasing frequency of sensitive discussions. Several patient characteristics appear to influence providers' likelihood of conversations about harmful partner behaviors. Compared with prior data, this pilot study suggests potential benefits of using provider scripts to guide discussions.
计划生育(FP)提供者处于解决有害伴侣行为的最佳位置,但面临着一些障碍。我们评估了一种交互式应用程序的有效性,以促进医患之间关于亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)、生殖胁迫(RC)、钱包大小的教育卡和性传播感染(STI)的讨论。我们从四个 FP 诊所随机选择了参与者(讲英语的 16-29 岁女性),分为两组:创伤知情个性化脚本(TIPS)-加和 TIPS-基本。我们开发了一个应用程序,提示(1)定制的提供者脚本(TIPS-Plus 和 TIPS-Basic)和(2)患者的心理教育信息(仅 TIPS-Plus)。患者完成了就诊前和就诊后的调查。我们使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较了 TIPS-Plus 和 TIPS-Basic 之间 IPV、RC、卡片和 STI 讨论的平均综合评分,使用有序回归探索了预测因素,并使用卡方比较了实施情况与历史数据。在 240 名参与者中,47.5%报告有终身 IPV,12.5%报告有近期 IPV,7.1%报告有近期 RC。在任何结果中,两个手臂之间的综合评分都没有出现统计学上的显著差异。几个显著的预测因素与患者-提供者讨论的高分有关,包括种族、就诊原因、避孕方法和避孕套使用不当。与 TIPS-Basic 和 TIPS-Plus 的历史临床数据相比,IPV、RC 和 STI 讨论的实施显著增加(<0.0001)。我们没有发现患者激活信息增加敏感讨论频率的额外好处。一些患者特征似乎影响提供者讨论有害伴侣行为的可能性。与之前的数据相比,这项试点研究表明,使用提供者脚本来指导讨论具有潜在的益处。