Carolina Women's Research and Wellness Center, Durham, North Carolina; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Allergan plc, Irvine, California; Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey; and the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;133(5):869-878. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003211.
To investigate effects of ulipristal acetate on health-related quality of life (QOL) and symptom severity in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas and abnormal uterine bleeding.
Women were randomized to ulipristal (5 mg, 10 mg) or placebo in two phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (VENUS I and II). Health-related QOL and symptom severity were assessed at baseline, and over one (VENUS I and II) and two (VENUS II) 12-week treatment courses using the Uterine Fibroid Symptom Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire. In pooled VENUS I and II data, change from baseline to the end of the first course for each Uterine Fibroid Symptom Health-Related Quality of Life scale was analyzed, including a Revised Activities subscale that measured physical and social activities. The proportion of women achieving meaningful change in the Symptom Severity (20 or more points), Health-Related QOL Total (20 or more points), and Revised Activities (30 or more points) scales was calculated. In VENUS II data, change from baseline to the end of each course in each scale was analyzed for each treatment arm.
In pooled analyses, the intent-to-treat population included 589 patients (placebo, n=169; ulipristal 5 mg, n=215; ulipristal 10 mg, n=205). Significantly greater improvements from baseline in all Uterine Fibroid Symptom Health-Related Quality of Life scales were observed with both ulipristal doses compared with placebo (P<.001). A meaningful change in Revised Activities was achieved by 51 patients receiving placebo (34.9%), compared with 144 (73.5%; OR 5.0 [97.5% CI 2.9-8.6]) and 141 (80.6%; OR 7.9 [97.5% CI 4.3-14.6]) patients receiving ulipristal 5 mg, and 10 mg, respectively. In VENUS II, at end of courses 1 and 2, both ulipristal doses demonstrated significant improvements from baseline compared with placebo for all Uterine Fibroid Symptom Health-Related Quality of Life scales (P<.01). Mean Revised Activities scores showed that beneficial ulipristal effects were maintained in course 2, and improvements occurred on switching to ulipristal; results for other scales were similar.
Ulipristal was associated with significant improvements in health-related QOL and symptom severity compared with placebo for women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02147197 and NCT02147158.
Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland.
研究醋酸乌利司他对有症状的子宫肌瘤和异常子宫出血妇女的健康相关生活质量(QOL)和症状严重程度的影响。
将妇女随机分配至醋酸乌利司他(5mg、10mg)或安慰剂,进行两项 3 期、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(VENUS I 和 II)。使用子宫肌瘤症状健康相关生活质量问卷,在基线时以及第 1 个(VENUS I 和 II)和第 2 个(VENUS II)12 周治疗疗程中评估健康相关 QOL 和症状严重程度。在 VENUS I 和 II 的汇总数据中,分析从基线到第一个疗程结束时每个子宫肌瘤症状健康相关生活质量量表的变化,包括衡量身体和社会活动的修订活动子量表。计算在症状严重程度(20 分或更多)、健康相关 QOL 总分(20 分或更多)和修订活动(30 分或更多)量表中达到有意义变化的妇女比例。在 VENUS II 数据中,分析每个治疗臂在每个疗程中从基线到结束时每个量表的变化。
在汇总分析中,意向治疗人群包括 589 名患者(安慰剂组,n=169;乌利司他 5mg 组,n=215;乌利司他 10mg 组,n=205)。与安慰剂相比,两种乌利司他剂量均显著改善所有子宫肌瘤症状健康相关生活质量量表的基线(P<.001)。接受安慰剂的 51 名患者(34.9%)在修订活动方面取得了有意义的改善,而接受乌利司他 5mg 的 144 名患者(73.5%;OR 5.0 [97.5%CI 2.9-8.6])和接受乌利司他 10mg 的 141 名患者(80.6%;OR 7.9 [97.5%CI 4.3-14.6])分别实现了这一目标。在 VENUS II 中,在第 1 个和第 2 个疗程结束时,与安慰剂相比,两种乌利司他剂量均显著改善了所有子宫肌瘤症状健康相关生活质量量表的基线(P<.01)。修订活动的平均评分表明,乌利司他的有益作用在第 2 个疗程中得以维持,并且在转换为乌利司他时也有改善;其他量表的结果相似。
与安慰剂相比,醋酸乌利司他可显著改善有症状的子宫肌瘤妇女的健康相关 QOL 和症状严重程度。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02147197 和 NCT02147158。
爱尔兰的艾尔建公司。